Re: [PATCH] clk: tegra: mark TEGRA210_CLK_DBGAPB as always on

Peter De Schrijver
2017-03-06T08:38:35Z

On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 05:56:49PM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote:
>
> On 28/02/17 15:19, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> > This is needed to make the JTAG debugging interface work.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra210.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra210.c b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra210.c
> > index 9a2512a..708f5f1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra210.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra210.c
> > @@ -2680,6 +2680,7 @@ static void tegra210_cpu_clock_resume(void)
> > { TEGRA210_CLK_EMC, TEGRA210_CLK_CLK_MAX, 0, 1 },
> > { TEGRA210_CLK_MSELECT, TEGRA210_CLK_CLK_MAX, 0, 1 },
> > { TEGRA210_CLK_CSITE, TEGRA210_CLK_CLK_MAX, 0, 1 },
> > + { TEGRA210_CLK_DBGAPB, TEGRA210_CLK_CLK_MAX, 0, 1 },
> > { TEGRA210_CLK_TSENSOR, TEGRA210_CLK_CLK_M, 400000, 0 },
> > { TEGRA210_CLK_I2C1, TEGRA210_CLK_PLL_P, 0, 0 },
> > { TEGRA210_CLK_I2C2, TEGRA210_CLK_PLL_P, 0, 0 },
>
> Should there be some dependency on say CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL? I am not
> sure we always want this on for all cases.

Why would you not want it to be always on?

Cheers,

Peter.