From: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>
To: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>, <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: Re-evaluate clock rate on min/max update
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2017 14:44:40 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170407114440.GD25177@tbergstrom-lnx.Nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1490103807-21821-1-git-send-email-pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 03:43:26PM +0200, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> Whenever a user change its min or max rate limit of a clock, we need to
> re-evaluate the current clock rate and possibly change it if the new limits
> require so. To do this clk_set_rate_range() already calls
> clk_core_set_rate_nolock, however this won't have the intended effect
> because the core clock rate hasn't changed. To fix this, move the test to
> avoid setting the same core clock rate again, to clk_set_rate() so
> clk_core_set_rate_nolock() can change the clock rate when min or max have
> been updated, even when the core clock rate has not changed.
>
Ping! Any comments on this?
Peter.
> Signed-off-by: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>
> ---
> drivers/clk/clk.c | 13 +++++++------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> index 2fa2fb8..0b815d1 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> @@ -1569,10 +1569,6 @@ static int clk_core_set_rate_nolock(struct clk_core *core,
> if (!core)
> return 0;
>
> - /* bail early if nothing to do */
> - if (rate == clk_core_get_rate_nolock(core))
> - return 0;
> -
> if ((core->flags & CLK_SET_RATE_GATE) && core->prepare_count)
> return -EBUSY;
>
> @@ -1621,16 +1617,21 @@ static int clk_core_set_rate_nolock(struct clk_core *core,
> */
> int clk_set_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate)
> {
> - int ret;
> + int ret = 0;
>
> if (!clk)
> - return 0;
> + return ret;
>
> /* prevent racing with updates to the clock topology */
> clk_prepare_lock();
>
> + /* bail early if nothing to do */
> + if (rate == clk_core_get_rate_nolock(clk->core))
> + goto out;
> +
> ret = clk_core_set_rate_nolock(clk->core, rate);
>
> +out:
> clk_prepare_unlock();
>
> return ret;
> --
> 1.9.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-07 11:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-21 13:43 [PATCH] clk: Re-evaluate clock rate on min/max update Peter De Schrijver
2017-04-07 11:44 ` Peter De Schrijver [this message]
2017-04-12 16:46 ` Stephen Boyd
2017-04-13 7:48 ` Peter De Schrijver
2017-04-28 7:17 ` Peter De Schrijver
2017-05-16 7:38 ` Peter De Schrijver
2017-06-01 9:12 ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-02 10:15 ` Peter De Schrijver
2017-06-02 22:45 ` Stephen Boyd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170407114440.GD25177@tbergstrom-lnx.Nvidia.com \
--to=pdeschrijver@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).