From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 19:03:14 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
To: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>,
	linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/10] clk: fix incorrect usage of ENOSYS
Message-ID: <20170712020314.GX22780@codeaurora.org>
References: <20170612194438.12298-1-jbrunet@baylibre.com>
 <20170612194438.12298-10-jbrunet@baylibre.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <20170612194438.12298-10-jbrunet@baylibre.com>
List-ID: <linux-clk.vger.kernel.org>

On 06/12, Jerome Brunet wrote:
> ENOSYS is special and should only be used for incorrect syscall number.
> It does not seem to be the case here.
> 
> Reported by checkpatch.pl while working on clock protection.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>

Could also go earlier in the series.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project