public inbox for linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
To: "David.Wu" <david.wu@rock-chips.com>
Cc: "Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
	"Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	'黄涛' <huangtao@rock-chips.com>,
	"Kever Yang" <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>,
	张睛 <zhangqing@rock-chips.com>, 许剑群 <jay.xu@rock-chips.com>,
	"Doug Anderson" <dianders@chromium.org>,
	"Brian Norris" <briannorris@chromium.org>,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	"linux-clk@vger.kernel.org" <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Michael Turquette" <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	"Stephen Boyd" <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [v5,22/46] pwm: rockchip: avoid glitches on already running PWMs
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2017 16:07:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170804160701.4d9f404d@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a5efa7d7-ceb5-e6b0-b2d1-2d79cd20265f@rock-chips.com>

+Stephen, Mike and the linux-clk ML.

On Fri, 4 Aug 2017 20:45:04 +0800
"David.Wu" <david.wu@rock-chips.com> wrote:

> Hi Boris & Heiko,
> 
> 在 2016/3/31 4:03, Boris BREZILLON 写道:
> > +	/* Keep the PWM clk enabled if the PWM appears to be up and running. */
> > +	pwm_get_state(pc->chip.pwms, &pstate);
> > +	if (!pstate.enabled)
> > +		clk_disable(pc->clk);  
> 
> We found a issue recently, if the pwm0 is not enabled at uboot and pwm2 
> is enabled at uboot, the PWM clock will be disabled at pwm0's probe. It 
> is true to close the pwm clock, and the pwm2 can't work during a while, 
> until the pwm2 probe, because the pwm0 and pwm2 are the same clock for 
> their work. In fact, the pwm0 can not know the pwm2's status.
> 
> So we need to get all the PWMs state in a public place where it's early 
> than the PWM probe, if that's the way it is. Then keep the PWM clk 
> enabled if theis is one PWM appears to be up and running. The place 
> maybe in the clock core init, like adding pwm clock as critial one.
> 
> Another way is that we don't enable pwm clock firstly at PWM probe, 
> because whether or not the PWM state has been enabled in the Uboot, like 
> other modules, our chip default PWM clock registers are enabled at the 
> beginning, read the PWM registers directly to know the PWM state. Then 
> if the PWM state is enabled, call the enable_clk(pc->clk) to add the 
> clock count=1. If the PWM state is disabled, we do nothing. After all 
> the PWMs are probed and all modules are probed, the clock core will gate 
> the PWM clock if the clock count is 0, and keep clk enabled if the clock 
> count is not 0.
> 
> How do you feel about it?

Ouch. That's indeed hard to solve in a clean way. I may have
something to suggest but I'm not sure clk maintainers will like it: what
if we make clk_disable() and clk_unprepare() just decrement the refcount
before the disable-unused-clks procedure has been executed (see
proposed patch below)? This way all clks that have been enabled by the
bootloader will stay in such state until all drivers have had a chance
to retain them (IOW, call clk_prepare()+clk_enable()).

BTW, I think the problem you're describing here is not unique to PWM
devices, it's just that now, some PWM drivers are smart and try to keep
clks enabled to prevent glitches.

--->8---
>From 47dcdc1bcc30b3ae1f76d33be824d2519a4dcca8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2017 15:55:49 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] clk: Keep clocks in their initial state until
 clk_disable_unused() is called

Some drivers are briefly preparing+enabling the clock in their
->probe() hook and disable+unprepare them before leaving the function.

This can be problem if a clock is shared between different devices, and
one of these devices is critical to the system. If this clock is
enabled/disabled by a non-critical device before the driver of the
critical one had a chance to enable+prepare it, there might be a short
period of time during which the critical device is not clocked.

To solve this problem, we save the initial clock state (at registration
time) and prevent the clock from being disabled until kernel init is done
(which is when clk_disable_unused() is called).

Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
---
 drivers/clk/clk.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
index fc58c52a26b4..3f61374a364b 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
@@ -58,6 +58,8 @@ struct clk_core {
 	struct clk_core		*new_child;
 	unsigned long		flags;
 	bool			orphan;
+	bool			keep_enabled;
+	bool			keep_prepared;
 	unsigned int		enable_count;
 	unsigned int		prepare_count;
 	unsigned long		min_rate;
@@ -486,7 +488,7 @@ static void clk_core_unprepare(struct clk_core *core)
 
 	trace_clk_unprepare(core);
 
-	if (core->ops->unprepare)
+	if (core->ops->unprepare && !core->keep_prepared)
 		core->ops->unprepare(core->hw);
 
 	trace_clk_unprepare_complete(core);
@@ -602,7 +604,7 @@ static void clk_core_disable(struct clk_core *core)
 
 	trace_clk_disable_rcuidle(core);
 
-	if (core->ops->disable)
+	if (core->ops->disable && !core->keep_enabled)
 		core->ops->disable(core->hw);
 
 	trace_clk_disable_complete_rcuidle(core);
@@ -739,6 +741,12 @@ static void clk_unprepare_unused_subtree(struct clk_core *core)
 	hlist_for_each_entry(child, &core->children, child_node)
 		clk_unprepare_unused_subtree(child);
 
+	/*
+	 * Reset the ->keep_prepared flag so that subsequent calls to
+	 * clk_unprepare() on this clk actually unprepare it.
+	 */
+	core->keep_prepared = false;
+
 	if (core->prepare_count)
 		return;
 
@@ -770,6 +778,12 @@ static void clk_disable_unused_subtree(struct clk_core *core)
 
 	flags = clk_enable_lock();
 
+	/*
+	 * Reset the ->keep_enabled flag so that subsequent calls to
+	 * clk_disable() on this clk actually disable it.
+	 */
+	core->keep_enabled = false;
+
 	if (core->enable_count)
 		goto unlock_out;
 
@@ -2446,6 +2460,17 @@ static int __clk_core_init(struct clk_core *core)
 		core->accuracy = 0;
 
 	/*
+	 * We keep track of the initial clk status to keep clks in the state
+	 * they were left in by the bootloader until all drivers had a chance
+	 * to keep them prepared/enabled if they need to.
+	 */
+	if (core->ops->is_prepared && !clk_ignore_unused)
+		core->keep_prepared = core->ops->is_prepared(core->hw);
+
+	if (core->ops->is_enabled && !clk_ignore_unused)
+		core->keep_enabled = core->ops->is_enabled(core->hw);
+
+	/*
 	 * Set clk's phase.
 	 * Since a phase is by definition relative to its parent, just
 	 * query the current clock phase, or just assume it's in phase.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-08-04 14:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 112+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-30 20:03 [PATCH v5 00/46] pwm: add support for atomic update Boris Brezillon
2016-03-30 20:03 ` [PATCH v5 01/46] pwm: rcar: make use of pwm_is_enabled() Boris Brezillon
2016-04-12 11:01   ` Thierry Reding
2016-04-14 11:05     ` Boris Brezillon
2016-03-30 20:03 ` [PATCH v5 02/46] backlight: pwm_bl: remove useless call to pwm_set_period() Boris Brezillon
2016-04-12 11:03   ` Thierry Reding
2016-04-12 14:16     ` Lee Jones
2016-04-12 14:25       ` Thierry Reding
2016-03-30 20:03 ` [PATCH v5 03/46] backlight: lm3630a_bl: stop messing with the pwm->period field Boris Brezillon
2016-04-12 11:08   ` Thierry Reding
2016-04-12 14:16     ` Lee Jones
2016-04-12 14:26       ` Thierry Reding
2016-04-13  8:25         ` Lee Jones
2016-04-13  8:26           ` Lee Jones
2016-03-30 20:03 ` [PATCH v5 04/46] pwm: get rid of pwm->lock Boris Brezillon
2016-04-12 11:22   ` Thierry Reding
2016-04-12 11:32     ` Boris Brezillon
2016-04-12 11:46       ` Thierry Reding
2016-03-30 20:03 ` [PATCH v5 05/46] pwm: introduce the pwm_args concept Boris Brezillon
2016-03-30 21:55   ` Stephen Boyd
2016-03-31  7:09     ` Boris Brezillon
2016-03-31  7:57     ` Boris Brezillon
2016-04-12 11:39   ` Thierry Reding
2016-04-12 12:04     ` Boris Brezillon
2016-04-12 12:20       ` Thierry Reding
2016-04-12 12:55         ` Boris Brezillon
2016-04-12 13:06     ` Boris Brezillon
2016-04-12 13:15       ` Thierry Reding
2016-03-30 20:03 ` [PATCH v5 06/46] pwm: use pwm_get/set_xxx() helpers where appropriate Boris Brezillon
2016-03-30 20:03 ` [PATCH v5 07/46] clk: pwm: use pwm_get_args() " Boris Brezillon
2016-03-30 21:58   ` Stephen Boyd
2016-03-30 20:03 ` [PATCH v5 08/46] hwmon: pwm-fan: " Boris Brezillon
2016-03-30 22:52   ` Guenter Roeck
2016-03-31  7:07     ` Boris Brezillon
2016-04-04 15:20       ` Thierry Reding
2016-04-01  8:29   ` Kamil Debski
2016-03-30 20:03 ` [PATCH v5 09/46] misc: max77693-haptic: " Boris Brezillon
2016-03-30 20:03 ` [PATCH v5 10/46] leds: pwm: " Boris Brezillon
2016-03-31  7:13   ` Jacek Anaszewski
2016-03-30 20:03 ` [PATCH v5 11/46] regulator: " Boris Brezillon
2016-03-30 20:03 ` [PATCH v5 12/46] fbdev: ssd1307fb: " Boris Brezillon
2016-03-30 20:03 ` [PATCH v5 13/46] backlight: pwm_bl: " Boris Brezillon
2016-03-30 20:03 ` [PATCH v5 14/46] pwm: keep PWM state in sync with hardware state Boris Brezillon
2016-03-30 20:03 ` [PATCH v5 15/46] pwm: introduce the pwm_state concept Boris Brezillon
2016-04-12 11:49   ` Thierry Reding
2016-04-12 12:17     ` Boris Brezillon
2016-04-12 12:21       ` Thierry Reding
2016-04-12 12:45         ` Boris Brezillon
2016-04-12 13:11           ` Thierry Reding
2016-04-12 13:26             ` Boris Brezillon
2016-04-12 14:05               ` Thierry Reding
2016-04-12 14:13                 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-03-30 20:03 ` [PATCH v5 16/46] pwm: move the enabled/disabled info into pwm_state Boris Brezillon
2016-04-12 11:51   ` Thierry Reding
2016-03-30 20:03 ` [PATCH v5 17/46] pwm: add the PWM initial state retrieval infra Boris Brezillon
2016-03-30 20:03 ` [PATCH v5 18/46] pwm: add the core infrastructure to allow atomic update Boris Brezillon
2016-03-30 20:03 ` [PATCH v5 19/46] pwm: switch to the atomic API Boris Brezillon
2016-03-30 20:03 ` [PATCH v5 20/46] pwm: add information about polarity, duty cycle and period to debugfs Boris Brezillon
2016-03-30 20:03 ` [PATCH v5 21/46] pwm: rockchip: add initial state retrieval Boris Brezillon
2016-03-30 20:03 ` [PATCH v5 22/46] pwm: rockchip: avoid glitches on already running PWMs Boris Brezillon
     [not found]   ` <a5efa7d7-ceb5-e6b0-b2d1-2d79cd20265f@rock-chips.com>
2017-08-04 14:07     ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2017-08-04 14:48       ` [v5,22/46] " Heiko Stuebner
2017-08-04 16:22         ` Doug Anderson
2017-08-21 15:39           ` Boris Brezillon
2017-08-21 16:49             ` Doug Anderson
2017-08-21 19:50               ` Boris Brezillon
2017-08-07  7:43         ` Elaine Zhang
2016-03-30 20:03 ` [PATCH v5 23/46] pwm: rockchip: add support for atomic update Boris Brezillon
2016-03-30 20:03 ` [PATCH v5 24/46] pwm: sti: add support for initial state retrieval Boris Brezillon
2016-03-30 20:03 ` [PATCH v5 25/46] pwm: sti: avoid glitches on already running PWMs Boris Brezillon
2016-03-30 20:03 ` [PATCH v5 26/46] pwm: sun4i: implement hardware readout Boris Brezillon
2016-03-31  8:00   ` Alexandre Belloni
2016-03-30 20:03 ` [PATCH v5 27/46] regulator: pwm: adjust PWM config at probe time Boris Brezillon
2016-03-30 21:22   ` Mark Brown
2016-03-30 20:03 ` [PATCH v5 28/46] regulator: pwm: swith to the atomic PWM API Boris Brezillon
2016-03-30 21:23   ` Mark Brown
2016-03-30 20:03 ` [PATCH v5 29/46] regulator: pwm: properly initialize the ->state field Boris Brezillon
2016-03-30 20:03 ` [PATCH v5 30/46] regulator: pwm: retrieve correct voltage Boris Brezillon
2016-03-30 21:24   ` Mark Brown
2016-04-07 21:54     ` Boris Brezillon
2016-04-12  4:42       ` Mark Brown
2016-04-12  8:37         ` Boris Brezillon
2016-04-12 10:09           ` Mark Brown
2016-04-12 10:31             ` Boris Brezillon
2016-03-30 20:03 ` [PATCH v5 31/46] pwm: update documentation Boris Brezillon
2016-03-30 20:03 ` [PATCH v5 32/46] pwm: deprecate pwm_config(), pwm_enable() and pwm_disable() Boris Brezillon
2016-03-31 17:38   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2016-03-31 18:54     ` Boris Brezillon
2016-04-04 15:22       ` Thierry Reding
2016-03-30 20:03 ` [PATCH v5 33/46] pwm: replace pwm_disable() by pwm_apply_state() Boris Brezillon
2016-03-30 20:03 ` [PATCH v5 34/46] clk: pwm: switch to the atomic API Boris Brezillon
2016-03-30 22:01   ` Stephen Boyd
2016-03-31  6:57     ` Boris Brezillon
2016-04-04 15:30       ` Thierry Reding
2016-03-30 20:03 ` [PATCH v5 35/46] hwmon: pwm-fan: " Boris Brezillon
2016-04-01  8:29   ` Kamil Debski
2016-03-30 20:03 ` [PATCH v5 36/46] input: misc: max77693: " Boris Brezillon
2016-03-31 17:48   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2016-03-31 18:57     ` Boris Brezillon
2016-04-04 15:34       ` Thierry Reding
2016-03-30 20:04 ` [PATCH v5 37/46] input: misc: max8997: switch to the atomic PWM API Boris Brezillon
2016-03-30 20:04 ` [PATCH v5 38/46] input: misc: pwm-beeper: " Boris Brezillon
2016-03-30 20:04 ` [PATCH v5 39/46] leds: pwm: " Boris Brezillon
2016-03-30 20:04 ` [PATCH v5 40/46] backlight: lm3630a: " Boris Brezillon
2016-03-30 20:04 ` [PATCH v5 41/46] backlight: lp855x: " Boris Brezillon
2016-03-30 20:04 ` [PATCH v5 42/46] backlight: lp8788: " Boris Brezillon
2016-03-30 20:04 ` [PATCH v5 43/46] backlight: pwm_bl: " Boris Brezillon
2016-03-30 20:04 ` [PATCH v5 44/46] video: ssd1307fb: " Boris Brezillon
2016-03-30 20:04 ` [PATCH v5 45/46] drm: i915: " Boris Brezillon
2016-03-30 20:04 ` [PATCH v5 46/46] ARM: s3c24xx: rx1950: " Boris Brezillon
2016-03-30 20:18 ` [PATCH v5 00/46] pwm: add support for atomic update Boris Brezillon
2016-04-11 22:42 ` Boris Brezillon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170804160701.4d9f404d@bbrezillon \
    --to=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=briannorris@chromium.org \
    --cc=david.wu@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=huangtao@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=jay.xu@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=kever.yang@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=zhangqing@rock-chips.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox