From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 14:56:21 -0700 From: Stephen Boyd To: Jeremy Linton Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com, hanjun.guo@linaro.org, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, will.deacon@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, mturquette@baylibre.com, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, jhugo@codeaurora.org, wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com, Jonathan.Zhang@cavium.com, ahs3@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] arm64: Fixup users of topology_physical_package_id Message-ID: <20171002215621.GS457@codeaurora.org> References: <20170919184751.25110-1-jeremy.linton@arm.com> <20170919184751.25110-6-jeremy.linton@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20170919184751.25110-6-jeremy.linton@arm.com> List-ID: On 09/19, Jeremy Linton wrote: > There are a few arm64 specific users (cpufreq, psci, etc) which really > want the cluster rather than the topology_physical_package_id(). Lets > convert those users to topology_cod_id(). That way when we start > differentiating the socket/cluster they will continue to behave correctly. > > Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton > --- For: > drivers/clk/clk-mb86s7x.c | 2 +- Acked-by: Stephen Boyd -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project