From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 08:12:28 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: ALKML <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	DTML <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, Roy Franz <roy.franz@cavium.com>,
	Harb Abdulhamid <harba@codeaurora.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Loc Ho <lho@apm.com>,
	Alexey Klimov <alexey.klimov@arm.com>,
	Ryan Harkin <Ryan.Harkin@arm.com>,
	Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 18/22] clk: add support for clocks provided by SCMI
Message-ID: <20171103151228.GS11011@codeaurora.org>
References: <1506604306-20739-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com>
 <1506604306-20739-19-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com>
 <20171102072350.GO30645@codeaurora.org>
 <c0b80daf-6361-87eb-fde6-a9d6a71e3e82@arm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <c0b80daf-6361-87eb-fde6-a9d6a71e3e82@arm.com>
List-ID: <linux-clk.vger.kernel.org>

On 11/02, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> 
> 
> On 02/11/17 07:23, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Is there a lot of copy/paste going on from clk-scpi.c? Maybe it
> > could be consolidated?
> > 
> 
> Not much apart from the usual driver skeleton. Also SCPI specification
> will not be enhanced any further while SCMI will be. So they will
> deviated in the feature set going further. Even I was thinking of
> merging then together initially but based on some WIP changes to the
> specification, I thought it may not be good idea. But if we think it can
> be merged in future , I will do that for sure(for easy maintenance)
> 

Ok, no worries from me. Thanks for taking another look.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project