From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2018 15:10:25 +0000 From: James Hogan To: PrasannaKumar Muralidharan Cc: Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Ralf Baechle , Michael Turquette , sboyd@codeaurora.org, "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , Linux-MIPS , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, open list , Paul Cercueil , Mathieu Malaterre , Dominik Peklo Subject: Re: [RFC 3/4] MIPS: Ingenic: Initial X1000 SoC support Message-ID: <20180307151025.GP4197@saruman> References: <20170927151527.25570-1-prasannatsmkumar@gmail.com> <20170927151527.25570-4-prasannatsmkumar@gmail.com> <20180306000832.GL4197@saruman> <20180307143541.GN4197@saruman> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ffBYM5qgR8HH9Mta" In-Reply-To: List-ID: --ffBYM5qgR8HH9Mta Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 08:35:00PM +0530, PrasannaKumar Muralidharan wrote: > On 7 March 2018 at 20:05, James Hogan wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 07:14:49PM +0530, PrasannaKumar Muralidharan wr= ote: > >> > Does X1000 use a different PRID, or is it basically just a JZ4780 co= re > >> > with different SoC peripherals? > >> > >> Yes X1000 does have a different PRID (PRID =3D 0x2ed1024f). X1000 has > > > > Right, so thats 0x2e000000 | PRID_COMP_INGENIC_D1 | PRID_IMP_JZRISC | > > 0x4f, which cpu-probe.c already handles (apparently the D1 company code > > is used for JZ4770 & JZ4775 too). >=20 > Okay. Does this mean I need not modify get_board_mach_type() and > get_system_type()? You still need to modify them, otherwise it won't understand "ingenic,x1000" compatible string, and will call it a JZ4740 in /proc/cpuinfo. > >> I used to get my code tested from Domink but I could not reach him for > >> quite some time. Before buying the development board myself I would > >> like to see if anyone can help me in testing. Do you have any contact > >> with Ingenic who can help in testing this? > > > > Not personally, but I'll ask around. Of course if nobody much cares > > about it in practice and nobody has the hardware, there may be little > > value in supporting it upstream. >=20 > Seems Jiaxun is interested in the board and is willing to help. Okay, cool. Cheers James --ffBYM5qgR8HH9Mta Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEd80NauSabkiESfLYbAtpk944dnoFAlqgAOEACgkQbAtpk944 dnq2tA/9GgJebgZ1Sqh3YkkT5rAjetuUyvMwU+OMWBwMunIu+1ImhcSTWocj0RRT JjRAbBM4KhYJWb+IfmRytEQZ4zXzRN8vZhf7vxD9q6JNa7bhCDZq2AXU7AHpF4aS I72mOO7J6DlgdP6j6qS4T9t7o/TyzgH50w1tMIFKPYCVP74LwSjWtB1goNiAPD/H +m9QZt3vvWJM6dUM0PT4RYXxgBQbcx6UaDqjR7FTf+J5DWrAKmduC4v1Yoo0192q N2BbyiiLdSsRGJ3nMdtcSRuVnU2b5xhU1Kh1Fg29ufhaiHLkeQJrkVeRZlwHDVUj Sl8gmny2316B3JTJyRUQXDA043dCcs4aCVKnFUMLJdW3z/p8DtTFoR6QVJzvEwoy jNmCiOVz8S9cK4u0TVhmUQGwPmO0bibcwycSfHQWMk3sX/fU+bz6O4D4YqriELOs xqB8tM89hEZlbqsAHs6npFTMJl7bih1jyDyoo1GBlvvLNKbiw1qpmn4K5QP7oNtk IWwS7150My7k6PZsm8HmdtiblrIHV27uy3/b20YcBhBsDewdUUP51ukbkwzTPwi9 Oq0pLUWo4uGkIacqISG37diUWrhqpyZjQOsi2jwimiPLjizih/3b7RIbfMez3Ur+ L4gqLfw2U/3ajhm7VZgnvu+/SKpWmBkSU+INlKktfcpKqiWWqXo= =NHQN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ffBYM5qgR8HH9Mta--