Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] clk: tegra: Mark HCLK, SCLK and EMC as critical

[Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1678 bytes --]

On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 04:33:29PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> On 15.01.2018 13:56, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> > On 10.01.2018 16:59, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> >> Machine dies if HCLK, SCLK or EMC is disabled. Hence mark these clocks
> >> as critical.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
> >> Acked-by: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> Change log:
> >> v2:     Fixed accidentally missed marking EMC as critical on Tegra30 and
> >>         Tegra124. Switched to a use of common EMC gate definition on Tegra20
> >>         and Tegra30.
> >>
> >> v3:     Dropped marking PLL_P outputs as critical, because seems they are
> >>         not so critical. Although, I still haven't got a definitive answer
> >>         about what exact HW functions are affected by the fixed-clocks.
> >>         Anyway it should be cleaner to correct the actual drivers.
> > 
> > Stephen / Michael, would it be possible to schedule these patches for 4.16? My
> > T20 and T30 devices aren't working without the 'critical clocks' patch. Things
> > happen to work with the opensource u-boot, but not with the proprietary
> > bootloader. It's probably not a big deal that out-of-tree devices are broken,
> > although would be nice to have one problem less.
> 
> Guys, is there anything I could do to get these patches in linux-next?

I've picked these up into the for-4.17/clk branch in the Tegra tree. I
already have that branch for the MBIST patches which are a dependency
for the for-4.17/soc branch.

Stephen, Mike, let me know if you have any objections to carrying these
in the Tegra tree.

Thanks,
Thierry

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]