Re: [PATCH net-next v2 15/15] arm64: dts: allwinner: a64: add SRAM controller device tree node

Maxime Ripard
2018-05-02T11:54:37Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2579 bytes --]

On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 06:19:51PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
>
>
> 于 2018年5月2日 GMT+08:00 下午5:53:21, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> 写到:
> >On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 5:51 PM, Maxime Ripard
> ><maxime.ripard@bootlin.com> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 12:12:27AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> >>> From: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.io>
> >>>
> >>> Allwinner A64 has a SRAM controller, and in the device tree
> >currently
> >>> we have a syscon node to enable EMAC driver to access the EMAC clock
> >>> register. As SRAM controller driver can now export regmap for this
> >>> register, replace the syscon node to the SRAM controller device
> >node,
> >>> and let EMAC driver to acquire its EMAC clock regmap.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.io>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
> >>> ---
> >>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi | 23
> >+++++++++++++++----
> >>> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
> >b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
> >>> index 1b2ef28c42bd..1c37659d9d41 100644
> >>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
> >>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
> >>> @@ -168,10 +168,25 @@
> >>> #size-cells = <1>;
> >>> ranges;
> >>>
> >>> - syscon: syscon@1c00000 {
> >>> - compatible =
> >"allwinner,sun50i-a64-system-controller",
> >>> - "syscon";
> >>> + sram_controller: sram-controller@1c00000 {
> >>> + compatible =
> >"allwinner,sun50i-a64-sram-controller";
> >>
> >> I don't think there's anything preventing us from keeping the
> >> -system-controller compatible. It's what was in the DT before, and
> >> it's how it's called in the datasheet.
> >
> >I actually meant to ask you about this. The -system-controller
> >compatible matches the datasheet better. Maybe we should just
> >switch to that one?
>
> No, if we do the switch the system-controller compatible,
> the device will be probed on the same memory region with
> a syscon on old DTs.

The device hasn't magically changed either. Maybe we just need to add
a check to make sure we don't have the syscon compatible in the SRAM
driver probe so that the double driver issue doesn't happen?

Maxime

--
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]