From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9966C43612 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 14:54:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B3F3206B6 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 14:54:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1547218473; bh=S6ElH7k6esPaLtiC5jX9RX0OZYVYFi1FXOVpTZQXqGU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=GvOHGgDW0DxfC/6XN71g5hCWYyUCCegVM0TEnvHFocuHvxCvsHT5UGyB2OaOE6Tnf AYHd60zDJt8MjNOyBSHg7h724gZSH8gnarqb6OzFUGAaRfLWfOJ9Zwd92tcrjRufdI rYPAMjuLsjfYd9AE+UPxXZkxKh9wWpwsrQl08j8Q= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2390247AbfAKOy1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jan 2019 09:54:27 -0500 Received: from mail-ot1-f67.google.com ([209.85.210.67]:40773 "EHLO mail-ot1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1733133AbfAKOy0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jan 2019 09:54:26 -0500 Received: by mail-ot1-f67.google.com with SMTP id s5so13299437oth.7; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 06:54:26 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=AxBTm/miHcpzTWrZ6oK4vYugnLB4OJ4qPCXeYxBcs9I=; b=LupztZU59vq4bf2BLj1nqyWo5GuK24RfUht9oLknUXNU+zdZkpOCw6QF9sAqYVcR65 CGmNg0xmh3ats325UUopYp8C4PZ+SlxSC/xkEtEGMhfYyM0IDdENU6mzldUFH6H3agug yR9ZskfXeIruTmMNzb6l7IIvaWkhmASpC7XnGvkVV+nnkLfolLfEekYxl6/9F02qdnfU cR/ivk+A4/hDKbzJIOuIgR2QIgHHn4CXWBXmVgtZek+wYSFpAmemdSW1XfKNZqSJY318 12tYOjPU2Ro1wZpShMngWx6dxjwHpWHEka69RZanUSNBvp3qiCbE57yMKK8IoL75hyDv SN/w== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukcsxXtByXBSlLT6cEuTCfq1qPM1WE82Hkk1tUbkNt8zVJWY6WNF 7HEyxaoqGnUS3jH0WVIe6g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN7V0LmbKUmrNricS3ji6iXmjFN22dEwo5X+zsrnshlMFJPUSzs6OlleaePLksTmKgNq0jURtg== X-Received: by 2002:a9d:4b0f:: with SMTP id q15mr5119413otf.201.1547218465767; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 06:54:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (24-155-109-49.dyn.grandenetworks.net. [24.155.109.49]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d3sm35589465otb.79.2019.01.11.06.54.24 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Fri, 11 Jan 2019 06:54:24 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 08:54:24 -0600 From: Rob Herring To: Heiko Stuebner Cc: Johan Jonker , hjc@rock-chips.com, airlied@linux.ie, mark.rutland@arm.com, mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] drm: rockchip: vop: add rk3066 vop definitions Message-ID: <20190111145424.GA21604@bogus> References: <20181229133318.18128-1-jbx6244@gmail.com> <20181229133318.18128-4-jbx6244@gmail.com> <154632658.xpTMZOjgxT@phil> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <154632658.xpTMZOjgxT@phil> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-clk-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 06:22:00PM +0100, Heiko Stuebner wrote: > Hi Johan, > > Am Samstag, 29. Dezember 2018, 14:33:14 CET schrieb Johan Jonker: > > From: Mark Yao > > > > This patch adds the rk3066 VOP definitions. > > > > The VOP or LCD Controller serves as interface between > > framebuffer memory and a display device (LCD panel or TV set). > > > > This SOC has two symmetrical LCDC's for a dual panel application. > > > > A LCDC has 5 display layers. > > Only 3 are used here. > > > > - Video layer 0 (Win0) > > - Video layer 1 (Win1) > > - OSD layer (Win2) > > Patch itself looks good, we'll need to wait a bit to give Rob a chance > to look at the (simple) dt-binding change and I'll drop the paragraph > about the display layers when applying. Don't wait on me for simple oneline compatible additions. Acked-by: Rob Herring Rob