linux-clk.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@nxp.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	linux-clk <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] clk: Add clk_min/max_rate entries in debugfs
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 12:35:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190628193556.BC814208CB@mail.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdWVoYPZFZPmfTWMU3pZc633uqkn70MyApcPhgUSgmCW-A@mail.gmail.com>

Quoting Geert Uytterhoeven (2019-06-28 04:58:27)
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 10:19 AM Leonard Crestez
> 
> > --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> > @@ -591,10 +591,12 @@ static void clk_core_get_boundaries(struct clk_core *core,
> >                                     unsigned long *min_rate,
> >                                     unsigned long *max_rate)
> >  {
> >         struct clk *clk_user;
> >
> > +       lockdep_assert_held(&prepare_lock);
> > +
> 
> I guess the clock maintainers want to see the addition of this check
> spun off into a separate patch....

Yes. I'm not sure we should have the assertion in there. I seem to
recall that we thought it might not always be necessary to have the
lock, but maybe that was wrong.


  reply	other threads:[~2019-06-28 19:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-28  8:19 [PATCH v2] clk: Add clk_min/max_rate entries in debugfs Leonard Crestez
2019-06-28 11:58 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-06-28 19:35   ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2019-07-01 13:13     ` Leonard Crestez

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190628193556.BC814208CB@mail.kernel.org \
    --to=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=leonard.crestez@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).