From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5AF8C76191 for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 22:00:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7437821842 for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 22:00:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1563228044; bh=Iy7STftwgZfnOEy4ZhvvVHfFsXBiGQ26ut0JvJEzVFs=; h=In-Reply-To:References:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:List-ID:From; b=0tyPmYf3Cu8Sly7WyHJUOQkVVE2yxtAv83O5eughjV5xuH7ftI7HBx4q6RRLSpmBJ t3zneH3ETGjk+Y1ixW88k7X+4OdY3nnDuB3h/tyTi5qtGFy00bPc3dflvJqP+2Eniq bu1BZFKADWpj8gdpD2VZxXev4MsEWLDLjFXxPGHk= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731774AbfGOWAo (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Jul 2019 18:00:44 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:60996 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727862AbfGOWAn (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Jul 2019 18:00:43 -0400 Received: from kernel.org (unknown [104.132.0.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 55E8A20665; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 22:00:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1563228043; bh=Iy7STftwgZfnOEy4ZhvvVHfFsXBiGQ26ut0JvJEzVFs=; h=In-Reply-To:References:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=lVfD/jQOT5YdHENMFIJqYuaTYaZwgEZimApdtyeyxJcca4+PCOeMORIyMa5vkfqDE Zd39bIh+JO/NRUbCY3qpPGwtnlUy8twpjL0l36r5d0ddjjiZYArSMc/uyvuTmmnRaA drIVrelplVuvLVL8edVH++rth2ndm6xD4p6BqDKY= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <20190715201234.13556-1-andrew.smirnov@gmail.com> References: <20190715201234.13556-1-andrew.smirnov@gmail.com> From: Stephen Boyd To: Andrey Smirnov , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org Cc: Andrey Smirnov , Russell King , Chris Healy , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] clk: Sync prototypes for clk_bulk_enable() User-Agent: alot/0.8.1 Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 15:00:42 -0700 Message-Id: <20190715220043.55E8A20665@mail.kernel.org> Sender: linux-clk-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org Quoting Andrey Smirnov (2019-07-15 13:12:29) > No-op version of clk_bulk_enable() should have the same protoype as > the real implementation, so constify the last argument to make it so. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Andrey Smirnov > Cc: Russell King > Cc: Chris Healy > Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > --- No cover letter, but I'm inclined to squash these all together into one patch instead of 6. I'm not sure why each function gets a different patch. > include/linux/clk.h | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >=20