linux-clk.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
	Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: ti: clkctrl: Fix hidden dependency to node name with reg-names
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 16:28:42 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190918232842.E2CBB21907@mail.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190918205344.GE5610@atomide.com>

Quoting Tony Lindgren (2019-09-18 13:53:44)
> Hi,
> 
> * Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> [190918 18:08]:
> > Quoting Tony Lindgren (2019-09-08 12:42:41)
> > > Or do you have some better ideas on how to name a clock controller
> > > in the device tree?
> > > 
> > 
> > Why does the name of the clock controller or clkdm_name matter? Using a
> > string from reg-names smells like a workaround to describe some sort of
> > linkage between things that isn't being described in DT today.
> 
> Correct. This problem will eventually disappear with genpd
> handling the clockdomains.
> 
> But currently the clockdomain name is parsed from the dt node
> name, which is not standard practise. Using reg-names
> is a standard binding, and it's usage follows the standand
> here to describe the reg range.
> 
> Then eventually with genpd, the reg-names will just become
> optinoal. But until that happens the $subject patch fixes
> issues as described in the patch.
> 

Is anything broken? It looks like the hidden dependency on the node name
is being changed to be a slightly less hidden dependency on reg-names.
reg-names is supposed to be an optional property, so we're trading one
thing for another. I still don't understand the reasoning here, but if
Tero is happy to ack/review this change then I'm not too worried about
it assuming the reg-names property eventually becomes optional. Just
seems like more work and DT churn for no to little gain?


  reply	other threads:[~2019-09-18 23:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-05 21:55 [PATCH] clk: ti: clkctrl: Fix hidden dependency to node name with reg-names Tony Lindgren
2019-09-07  3:55 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-09-08 19:42   ` Tony Lindgren
2019-09-18 18:07     ` Stephen Boyd
2019-09-18 20:53       ` Tony Lindgren
2019-09-18 23:28         ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2019-09-19  0:01           ` Tony Lindgren
2019-09-19  6:46 ` Tero Kristo
2019-09-19 14:12   ` Tony Lindgren
2019-09-19 16:50     ` Stephen Boyd
2019-09-19 17:06       ` Tony Lindgren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190918232842.E2CBB21907@mail.kernel.org \
    --to=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=t-kristo@ti.com \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).