From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C186FC432C3 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 23:03:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97765206EF for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 23:03:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1573686184; bh=DWcG9g07tw3M9huN94BEIUVN9ivCwtJITvLSKkiiuyE=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Cc:To:From:Subject:Date:List-ID:From; b=vttmBM4vGpoNmbTgN3KSbElwHZgN9AqlzknnpeYudHlU4DwRWX1YKqTNIHg+NGJd/ 983mOs/1NQdt2pcu545+OVIN11eKdPyqCgaiLGwbSAp61JPe3lvasJqy5Gky3jMOZX f5gv7fVrSeUyfpjH4/q0uTiAdeQadQzHcAKkUvCw= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726548AbfKMXDD (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Nov 2019 18:03:03 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:32908 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726434AbfKMXDD (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Nov 2019 18:03:03 -0500 Received: from kernel.org (unknown [104.132.0.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 726AE206E3; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 23:03:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1573686183; bh=DWcG9g07tw3M9huN94BEIUVN9ivCwtJITvLSKkiiuyE=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Cc:To:From:Subject:Date:From; b=SOC6qBd2cEUfb5+s6YU7eZCakm6+GOmE95FNDCaYeTPsvzu/5j1O3FrbsbDGEqoT6 u0hjg0ZRsWu37cOMfuUxDxItmpds5ZLkPtPSw4FIhTvvzDsYhgfxFhs/vOqZZhHTIE VLgmxubTZDNysAtypoBxw2pyB3S/wTwlIIoPDBA8= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <20191030004813.9187-1-digetx@gmail.com> References: <20191030004813.9187-1-digetx@gmail.com> Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Dmitry Osipenko , Jonathan Hunter , Michael Turquette , Peter De Schrijver , Prashant Gaikwad , Thierry Reding From: Stephen Boyd Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] clk: tegra: divider: Check UART's divider enable-bit state on rate's recalculation User-Agent: alot/0.8.1 Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 15:03:01 -0800 Message-Id: <20191113230303.726AE206E3@mail.kernel.org> Sender: linux-clk-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org Quoting Dmitry Osipenko (2019-10-29 17:48:13) > UART clock is divided using divisor values from DLM/DLL registers when > enable-bit is unset in clk register and clk's divider configuration isn't > taken onto account in this case. This doesn't cause any problems, but > let's add a check for the divider's enable-bit state, for consistency. >=20 > Acked-by: Peter De Schrijver > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko > --- Is this going to be picked up or should I just apply atop the tegra PR?