Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] clk: samsung: clk-pll: Implement pll0831x PLL type

Sylwester Nawrocki
2021-10-09T20:25:46Z

On 08.10.2021 17:43, Sam Protsenko wrote:
> pll0831x PLL is used in Exynos850 SoC for top-level fractional PLLs. The
> code was derived from very similar pll36xx type, with next differences:
>
> 1. Lock time for pll0831x is 500*P_DIV, when for pll36xx it's 3000*P_DIV
> 2. It's not suggested in Exynos850 TRM that S_DIV change doesn't require
> performing PLL lock procedure (which is done in pll36xx
> implementation)
> 3. The offset from PMS-values register to K-value register is 0x8 for
> pll0831x, when for pll36xx it's 0x4
>
> When defining pll0831x type, CON3 register offset should be provided as
> a "con" parameter of PLL() macro, like this:
>
> PLL(pll_0831x, 0, "fout_mmc_pll", "oscclk",
> PLL_LOCKTIME_PLL_MMC, PLL_CON3_PLL_MMC, pll0831x_26mhz_tbl),
>
> To define PLL rates table, one can use PLL_36XX_RATE() macro, e.g.:
>
> PLL_36XX_RATE(26 * MHZ, 799999877, 31, 1, 0, -15124)
>
> as it's completely appropriate for pl0831x type and there is no sense in
> duplicating that.
>
> If bit #1 (MANUAL_PLL_CTRL) is not set in CON1 register, it won't be
> possible to set new rate, with next error showing in kernel log:
>
> Could not lock PLL fout_mmc_pll
>
> That can happen for example if bootloader clears that bit beforehand.
> PLL driver doesn't account for that, so if MANUAL_PLL_CTRL bit was
> cleared, it's assumed it was done for a reason and it shouldn't be
> possible to change that PLL's rate at all.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sam Protsenko<semen.protsenko@linaro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski<krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
> Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi<cw00.choi@samsung.com>

Applied, thanks.