From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1D02C4167B for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 03:33:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1323460AbiAYD2a (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jan 2022 22:28:30 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40182 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S3423872AbiAYCiM (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jan 2022 21:38:12 -0500 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03262C061763; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 16:51:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B48D2B81229; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 00:51:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 63C7EC340E4; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 00:51:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1643071916; bh=AYg99rtmRl9GS4yUuo5uLAiqb7quz2ZcDW/VMq+g7Kc=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Cc:To:Date:From; b=Nkvd5G5CvqgnP0RHpwCGmlz7ri/u3HmRQ7YqqvRhXbxf6WGS2LRXTVVHVaALs2Zmm 5MaYkMuKA76K8ae7aF9Ur0vvAQXRWW2zAMIQb54bHPMe4+XFSyHx3QALKEeudvxc2p ABrYcKVyUJwQyPYW0umWNriQKC824SUVd9o9U6FCYlHu0zB2pIZc9d+dybQtgAEXFp fIGf7kbtEfMU34zFVlkt/wJUXGucoOHxJdeCzQoTmXDfIVKvQN3yZfndv5wXqjsU73 zW/t9fkJJNvroxfOC7izEtKt3MUSmEDIr+sPQsIHgC5C/X1H9NDxSCoC3FMDnWfEbA w/td4kRTpRxRg== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <1634280331-4150-1-git-send-email-wangqing@vivo.com> References: <1634280331-4150-1-git-send-email-wangqing@vivo.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] clk-si5341: replace snprintf in show functions with sysfs_emit From: Stephen Boyd Cc: mike.looijmans@topic.nl, Qing Wang To: Michael Turquette , Qing Wang , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 16:51:54 -0800 User-Agent: alot/0.10 Message-Id: <20220125005156.63C7EC340E4@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org Quoting Qing Wang (2021-10-14 23:45:28) > coccicheck complains about the use of snprintf() in sysfs show functions. >=20 > Fix the following coccicheck warning: > drivers/clk/clk-si5341.c:1471: WARNING: use scnprintf or sprintf. > drivers/clk/clk-si5341.c:1486: WARNING: use scnprintf or sprintf. > drivers/clk/clk-si5341.c:1501: WARNING: use scnprintf or sprintf. > drivers/clk/clk-si5341.c:1516: WARNING: use scnprintf or sprintf. >=20 > Use sysfs_emit instead of scnprintf or sprintf makes more sense. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Qing Wang > --- Applied to clk-next