From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2352C433F5 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 16:44:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1350007AbiD1QrU (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Apr 2022 12:47:20 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60776 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1350252AbiD1QrU (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Apr 2022 12:47:20 -0400 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4C52B246E for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 09:44:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 463785C0064; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 12:44:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 28 Apr 2022 12:44:04 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cerno.tech; h=cc :cc:content-transfer-encoding:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender :subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1651164244; x=1651250644; bh=R5 3gabn6igaXcKqQ4sBSjkUxxpHvOhoxHoyqAW8zPOU=; b=fQ5WDux7fLPJcPpDtn P0l9xaz3ToM/HY4OvdzU/ATrKhXpLZYeDg4qSBFiwsjPRI+hYsErPn6rJNWluztm vdj3TLmy188ekZ8TIUyiWO4SdtszFdZLm2kWXx7zuEQsTMwzOMHkpKR8PZ5EC9ql NzoEahCDgey1PhvQdSOoMliVudkbjElLDcflMNDpwi2TYAq72/6iiGfKMjbLyrzX 29GpVqdI0t7zEC4lYkK3T/iu16S7LHhyVkaz16s/6FXF3M2iBGSkFG3+jwD249gD ZM4RAnlds2DKWTZgrhUbt6+CphMTdq2LsSXegT1oDbb0KrpGDO/XWto0OgH2mDiG CtQQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:date:date :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t= 1651164244; x=1651250644; bh=R53gabn6igaXcKqQ4sBSjkUxxpHvOhoxHoy qAW8zPOU=; b=TXcpYihhb7cgmkwmJhS2TKvfFaXNl7+qEc1HGIISHzxy0A9qhyc HJOdKynoCuRwvuScVYqsu/TZU6Ht/4K7s8ebD1tfxQnRxT0UZcWNqRYeAPe0lgPS xjCnoPlK39DOo1Y8B7xKcBu84v7n3KQFRY/ydKKbWaShE0DhIsa0AIiZKol24nAW 20n+UJ6Ldg7WoVeyDG69XFkOUGS7BK/siEo908nEmaqzoBcznsO/WuCivXkBWV20 xZ4mT6pvy+FMfGUfnbid0mtJ/zDzy4o5kMkf7+ZWzCTx3V1OGeL3/+sDgBAt2unD W51fQKHVUKxLSKrg/oTqte9iiM624UxnpQA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrudejgddutdehucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvvefufffkofgjfhgggfestdekredtredttdenucfhrhhomhepofgrgihi mhgvucftihhprghrugcuoehmrgigihhmvgestggvrhhnohdrthgvtghhqeenucggtffrrg htthgvrhhnpeelkeefteduhfekjeeihfetudfguedvveekkeetteekhfekhfdtlefgfedu vdejhfenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedvnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpe hmrgigihhmvgestggvrhhnohdrthgvtghh X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 12:44:03 -0400 (EDT) From: Maxime Ripard To: Mike Turquette , Stephen Boyd , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org Cc: Marek Szyprowski , Tony Lindgren , Dmitry Baryshkov , Naresh Kamboju , Jerome Brunet , Neil Armstrong , Alexander Stein , Yassine Oudjana , Maxime Ripard Subject: [PATCH v2 10/28] clk: tests: Add tests for single parent mux Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 18:43:20 +0200 Message-Id: <20220428164338.717443-11-maxime@cerno.tech> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.35.1 In-Reply-To: <20220428164338.717443-1-maxime@cerno.tech> References: <20220428164338.717443-1-maxime@cerno.tech> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org We have a few tests for a mux with a single parent, testing the case where it used to be orphan. Let's leverage most of the code but register the clock properly to test a few trivial things. Tested-by: Alexander Stein # imx8mp Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski # exynos4210, meson g12b Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard --- drivers/clk/clk_test.c | 186 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 177 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk_test.c b/drivers/clk/clk_test.c index 429e96796c66..87f581c2e1e1 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/clk_test.c +++ b/drivers/clk/clk_test.c @@ -352,6 +352,181 @@ struct clk_single_parent_ctx { struct clk_hw hw; }; +static int clk_single_parent_mux_test_init(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_single_parent_ctx *ctx; + int ret; + + ctx = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!ctx) + return -ENOMEM; + test->priv = ctx; + + ctx->parent_ctx.rate = DUMMY_CLOCK_INIT_RATE; + ctx->parent_ctx.hw.init = + CLK_HW_INIT_NO_PARENT("parent-clk", + &clk_dummy_rate_ops, + 0); + + ret = clk_hw_register(NULL, &ctx->parent_ctx.hw); + if (ret) + return ret; + + ctx->hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT("test-clk", "parent-clk", + &clk_dummy_single_parent_ops, + CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT); + + ret = clk_hw_register(NULL, &ctx->hw); + if (ret) + return ret; + + return 0; +} + +static void +clk_single_parent_mux_test_exit(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_single_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv; + + clk_hw_unregister(&ctx->hw); + clk_hw_unregister(&ctx->parent_ctx.hw); +} + +/* + * Test that for a clock with a single parent, clk_get_parent() actually + * returns the parent. + */ +static void +clk_test_single_parent_mux_get_parent(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_single_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = hw->clk; + struct clk *parent; + + parent = clk_get_parent(clk); + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, clk_is_match(parent, ctx->parent_ctx.hw.clk)); +} + +/* + * Test that for a clock that can't modify its rate and with a single + * parent, if we set disjoints range on the parent and then the child, + * the second will return an error. + * + * FIXME: clk_set_rate_range() only considers the current clock when + * evaluating whether ranges are disjoints and not the upstream clocks + * ranges. + */ +static void +clk_test_single_parent_mux_set_range_disjoint_child_last(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_single_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = hw->clk; + struct clk *parent; + int ret; + + kunit_skip(test, "This needs to be fixed in the core."); + + parent = clk_get_parent(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_NE(test, parent, NULL); + + ret = clk_set_rate_range(parent, 1000, 2000); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0); + + ret = clk_set_rate_range(clk, 3000, 4000); + KUNIT_EXPECT_LT(test, ret, 0); +} + +/* + * Test that for a clock that can't modify its rate and with a single + * parent, if we set disjoints range on the child and then the parent, + * the second will return an error. + * + * FIXME: clk_set_rate_range() only considers the current clock when + * evaluating whether ranges are disjoints and not the downstream clocks + * ranges. + */ +static void +clk_test_single_parent_mux_set_range_disjoint_parent_last(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_single_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = hw->clk; + struct clk *parent; + int ret; + + kunit_skip(test, "This needs to be fixed in the core."); + + parent = clk_get_parent(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_NE(test, parent, NULL); + + ret = clk_set_rate_range(clk, 1000, 2000); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0); + + ret = clk_set_rate_range(parent, 3000, 4000); + KUNIT_EXPECT_LT(test, ret, 0); +} + +/* + * Test that for a clock that can't modify its rate and with a single + * parent, if we set a range on the parent and a more restrictive one on + * the child, and then call clk_round_rate(), the boundaries of the + * two clocks are taken into account. + */ +static void +clk_test_single_parent_mux_set_range_round_rate_child_smaller(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_single_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = hw->clk; + struct clk *parent; + unsigned long rate; + int ret; + + parent = clk_get_parent(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_NE(test, parent, NULL); + + ret = clk_set_rate_range(parent, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0); + + ret = clk_set_rate_range(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 + 1000, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2 - 1000); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0); + + rate = clk_round_rate(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 - 1000); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_GE(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 + 1000); + KUNIT_EXPECT_LE(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2 - 1000); + + rate = clk_round_rate(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2 + 1000); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_GE(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 + 1000); + KUNIT_EXPECT_LE(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2 - 1000); +} + +static struct kunit_case clk_single_parent_mux_test_cases[] = { + KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_single_parent_mux_get_parent), + KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_single_parent_mux_set_range_disjoint_child_last), + KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_single_parent_mux_set_range_disjoint_parent_last), + KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_single_parent_mux_set_range_round_rate_child_smaller), + {} +}; + +/* + * Test suite for a basic mux clock with one parent, with + * CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT on the child. + * + * These tests exercise the consumer API and check that the state of the + * child and parent are sane and consistent. + */ +static struct kunit_suite +clk_single_parent_mux_test_suite = { + .name = "clk-single-parent-mux-test", + .init = clk_single_parent_mux_test_init, + .exit = clk_single_parent_mux_test_exit, + .test_cases = clk_single_parent_mux_test_cases, +}; + static int clk_orphan_transparent_single_parent_mux_test_init(struct kunit *test) { struct clk_single_parent_ctx *ctx; @@ -388,14 +563,6 @@ static int clk_orphan_transparent_single_parent_mux_test_init(struct kunit *test return 0; } -static void clk_orphan_transparent_single_parent_mux_test_exit(struct kunit *test) -{ - struct clk_single_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv; - - clk_hw_unregister(&ctx->hw); - clk_hw_unregister(&ctx->parent_ctx.hw); -} - /* * Test that a mux-only clock, with an initial rate within a range, * will still have the same rate after the range has been enforced. @@ -440,7 +607,7 @@ static struct kunit_case clk_orphan_transparent_single_parent_mux_test_cases[] = static struct kunit_suite clk_orphan_transparent_single_parent_test_suite = { .name = "clk-orphan-transparent-single-parent-test", .init = clk_orphan_transparent_single_parent_mux_test_init, - .exit = clk_orphan_transparent_single_parent_mux_test_exit, + .exit = clk_single_parent_mux_test_exit, .test_cases = clk_orphan_transparent_single_parent_mux_test_cases, }; @@ -1125,6 +1292,7 @@ kunit_test_suites( &clk_range_test_suite, &clk_range_maximize_test_suite, &clk_range_minimize_test_suite, + &clk_single_parent_mux_test_suite, &clk_uncached_test_suite ); MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2"); -- 2.35.1