From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22874C433EF for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 16:44:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1350258AbiD1Qrb (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Apr 2022 12:47:31 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60856 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1350251AbiD1Qra (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Apr 2022 12:47:30 -0400 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEF17B1AB0 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 09:44:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 603235C013C; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 12:44:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 28 Apr 2022 12:44:14 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cerno.tech; h=cc :cc:content-transfer-encoding:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender :subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1651164254; x=1651250654; bh=TR +zDmb+TpU+c0Kgt4UsTlvSr7rf2NTnB/ftJ3pW8RM=; b=q5DHYNNIoX+4rlNRVm 7wzAPFFU7H+spa7AGi6bA2+zHvk22TR1634UHoUnJS6jeVJd8I0XEYsqntT4eWGj 1ShxODPfgNbUMhQ02Ls6y6Oqf1NHrYXacdspxDdRIL42XlYc9B9BWfwYHYCehA1S UHBl6y41PF5Wp9gaLBtPC5MPaowl8SDva0I8+o0JWTV/8Wkqpp+zQT1D/GumGdBi 0/ILKVZvfdAlejGjxrFam5V9ZPkrTq04k27VQmU1gMQzBvoZdddqGan1gFloAkny nn0MM7bKVhTcmVRDs4XjBkRFWdV9imKcUjxYhRk1CWcRVfN+F7XL4LwM/A6JCFGb LCNw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:date:date :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t= 1651164254; x=1651250654; bh=TR+zDmb+TpU+c0Kgt4UsTlvSr7rf2NTnB/f tJ3pW8RM=; b=wQtQokK+G4pnlmNXhoNQObFKETfJitSQVwIjmc8AIzhiQDkuhRi UgVRecHqlASVKKzvF/lagYWScoFCqkMTYOiPSZo9/PTWnhrLub+Bjq3N0Mfs2ZQ2 ohObfKyoSbvghrsjCMSm5kht0QEf9g5NGkei+7f4UhARIIfIwRJLWpGp2lS/9lZX N3cxQc1EZ9BNnhKJGcgwu3+DIjnC/r3y8NqaIiSxvVS6ame8LLvNSdLvXmKCz9vr 7DWyRE82XzgxgjQM3Tk9c0dG0X7LZS1rB+fNeSyrbfxiQxAPnDEGq/rbkL4qeKG+ dAFZAeTOiodFVUfsDAdzd2MWcr+wHQi8v3g== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrudejgddutdehucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvvefufffkofgjfhgggfestdekredtredttdenucfhrhhomhepofgrgihi mhgvucftihhprghrugcuoehmrgigihhmvgestggvrhhnohdrthgvtghhqeenucggtffrrg htthgvrhhnpeehleetfeejteeivdetveegtdetgeffffdvkeeuheejuedvjeefvdekffel gfefieenucffohhmrghinhepkhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivg epudenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhgrgihimhgvsegtvghrnhhordhtvggt hh X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 12:44:13 -0400 (EDT) From: Maxime Ripard To: Mike Turquette , Stephen Boyd , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org Cc: Marek Szyprowski , Tony Lindgren , Dmitry Baryshkov , Naresh Kamboju , Jerome Brunet , Neil Armstrong , Alexander Stein , Yassine Oudjana , Maxime Ripard Subject: [PATCH v2 15/28] clk: Set req_rate on reparenting Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 18:43:25 +0200 Message-Id: <20220428164338.717443-16-maxime@cerno.tech> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.35.1 In-Reply-To: <20220428164338.717443-1-maxime@cerno.tech> References: <20220428164338.717443-1-maxime@cerno.tech> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org If a non-rate clock started by default with a parent that never registered, core->req_rate will be 0. The expectation is that whenever the parent will be registered, req_rate will be updated with the new value that has just been computed. However, if that clock is a mux, clk_set_parent() can also make that clock no longer orphan. In this case however, we never update req_rate. Let's make sure it's the case for the newly unorphan clock and all its children. Tested-by: Alexander Stein # imx8mp Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski # exynos4210, meson g12b Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard --- drivers/clk/clk.c | 18 ++++ drivers/clk/clk_test.c | 231 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 249 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c index 604faa156817..4c4082a8fbb3 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c @@ -1765,6 +1765,23 @@ static void clk_core_update_orphan_status(struct clk_core *core, bool is_orphan) clk_core_update_orphan_status(child, is_orphan); } +/* + * Update the orphan rate and req_rate of @core and all its children. + */ +static void clk_core_update_orphan_child_rates(struct clk_core *core) +{ + struct clk_core *child; + unsigned long parent_rate = 0; + + if (core->parent) + parent_rate = core->parent->rate; + + core->rate = core->req_rate = clk_recalc(core, parent_rate); + + hlist_for_each_entry(child, &core->children, child_node) + clk_core_update_orphan_child_rates(child); +} + static void clk_reparent(struct clk_core *core, struct clk_core *new_parent) { bool was_orphan = core->orphan; @@ -1789,6 +1806,7 @@ static void clk_reparent(struct clk_core *core, struct clk_core *new_parent) } core->parent = new_parent; + clk_core_update_orphan_child_rates(core); } static struct clk_core *__clk_set_parent_before(struct clk_core *core, diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk_test.c b/drivers/clk/clk_test.c index c52098e463d3..4c71c6570021 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/clk_test.c +++ b/drivers/clk/clk_test.c @@ -575,6 +575,39 @@ clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_set_parent(struct kunit *test) clk_put(parent); } +/* + * Test that, for a mux that started orphan but got switched to a valid + * parent, calling clk_drop_range() on the mux won't affect the parent + * rate. + */ +static void +clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_set_parent_drop_range(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_multiple_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = hw->clk, *parent; + unsigned long parent_rate, new_parent_rate; + int ret; + + parent = clk_hw_get_clk(&ctx->parents_ctx[1].hw, NULL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, parent); + + parent_rate = clk_get_rate(parent); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, parent_rate, 0); + + ret = clk_set_parent(clk, parent); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0); + + ret = clk_drop_range(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0); + + new_parent_rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, new_parent_rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, parent_rate, new_parent_rate); + + clk_put(parent); +} + /* * Test that, for a mux that started orphan but got switched to a valid * parent, the rate of the mux and its new parent are consistent. @@ -603,6 +636,39 @@ clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_set_parent_get_rate(struct kunit KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, parent_rate, rate); } +/* + * Test that, for a mux that started orphan but got switched to a valid + * parent, calling clk_put() on the mux won't affect the parent rate. + */ +static void +clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_set_parent_put(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_multiple_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk *clk, *parent; + unsigned long parent_rate, new_parent_rate; + int ret; + + parent = clk_hw_get_clk(&ctx->parents_ctx[1].hw, NULL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, parent); + + clk = clk_hw_get_clk(&ctx->hw, NULL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, clk); + + parent_rate = clk_get_rate(parent); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, parent_rate, 0); + + ret = clk_set_parent(clk, parent); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0); + + clk_put(clk); + + new_parent_rate = clk_get_rate(parent); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, new_parent_rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, parent_rate, new_parent_rate); + + clk_put(parent); +} + /* * Test that, for a mux that started orphan but got switched to a valid * parent, calling clk_set_rate_range() will affect the parent state if @@ -634,6 +700,41 @@ clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_set_parent_set_range_modified(st clk_put(parent); } +/* + * Test that, for a mux that started orphan but got switched to a valid + * parent, calling clk_set_rate_range() won't affect the parent state if + * its rate is within range. + */ +static void +clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_set_parent_set_range_untouched(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_multiple_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = hw->clk, *parent; + unsigned long parent_rate, new_parent_rate; + int ret; + + parent = clk_hw_get_clk(&ctx->parents_ctx[1].hw, NULL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, parent); + + parent_rate = clk_get_rate(parent); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, parent_rate, 0); + + ret = clk_set_parent(clk, parent); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0); + + ret = clk_set_rate_range(clk, + DUMMY_CLOCK_INIT_RATE - 1000, + DUMMY_CLOCK_INIT_RATE + 1000); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0); + + new_parent_rate = clk_get_rate(parent); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, new_parent_rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, parent_rate, new_parent_rate); + + clk_put(parent); +} + /* * Test that, for a mux whose current parent hasn't been registered yet, * calling clk_set_rate_range() will succeed, and will be taken into @@ -696,8 +797,11 @@ clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_set_range_set_parent_get_rate(st static struct kunit_case clk_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_test_cases[] = { KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_get_parent), KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_set_parent), + KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_set_parent_drop_range), KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_set_parent_get_rate), + KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_set_parent_put), KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_set_parent_set_range_modified), + KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_set_parent_set_range_untouched), KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_set_range_round_rate), KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_set_range_set_parent_get_rate), {} @@ -983,6 +1087,132 @@ static struct kunit_suite clk_orphan_transparent_single_parent_test_suite = { .test_cases = clk_orphan_transparent_single_parent_mux_test_cases, }; +struct clk_single_parent_two_lvl_ctx { + struct clk_dummy_context parent_parent_ctx; + struct clk_dummy_context parent_ctx; + struct clk_hw hw; +}; + +static int +clk_orphan_two_level_root_last_test_init(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_single_parent_two_lvl_ctx *ctx; + int ret; + + ctx = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!ctx) + return -ENOMEM; + test->priv = ctx; + + ctx->parent_ctx.hw.init = + CLK_HW_INIT("intermediate-parent", + "root-parent", + &clk_dummy_single_parent_ops, + CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT); + ret = clk_hw_register(NULL, &ctx->parent_ctx.hw); + if (ret) + return ret; + + ctx->hw.init = + CLK_HW_INIT("test-clk", "intermediate-parent", + &clk_dummy_single_parent_ops, + CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT); + ret = clk_hw_register(NULL, &ctx->hw); + if (ret) + return ret; + + ctx->parent_parent_ctx.rate = DUMMY_CLOCK_INIT_RATE; + ctx->parent_parent_ctx.hw.init = + CLK_HW_INIT_NO_PARENT("root-parent", + &clk_dummy_rate_ops, + 0); + ret = clk_hw_register(NULL, &ctx->parent_parent_ctx.hw); + if (ret) + return ret; + + return 0; +} + +static void +clk_orphan_two_level_root_last_test_exit(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_single_parent_two_lvl_ctx *ctx = test->priv; + + clk_hw_unregister(&ctx->hw); + clk_hw_unregister(&ctx->parent_ctx.hw); + clk_hw_unregister(&ctx->parent_parent_ctx.hw); +} + +/* + * Test that, for a clock whose parent used to be orphan, clk_get_rate() + * will return the proper rate. + */ +static void +clk_orphan_two_level_root_last_test_get_rate(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_single_parent_two_lvl_ctx *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = hw->clk; + unsigned long rate; + + rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_INIT_RATE); +} + +/* + * Test that, for a clock whose parent used to be orphan, + * clk_set_rate_range() won't affect its rate if it is already within + * range. + * + * See (for Exynos 4210): + * https://lore.kernel.org/linux-clk/366a0232-bb4a-c357-6aa8-636e398e05eb@samsung.com/ + */ +static void +clk_orphan_two_level_root_last_test_set_range(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_single_parent_two_lvl_ctx *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = hw->clk; + unsigned long rate; + int ret; + + ret = clk_set_rate_range(clk, + DUMMY_CLOCK_INIT_RATE - 1000, + DUMMY_CLOCK_INIT_RATE + 1000); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0); + + rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_INIT_RATE); +} + +static struct kunit_case +clk_orphan_two_level_root_last_test_cases[] = { + KUNIT_CASE(clk_orphan_two_level_root_last_test_get_rate), + KUNIT_CASE(clk_orphan_two_level_root_last_test_set_range), + {} +}; + +/* + * Test suite for a basic, transparent, clock with a parent that is also + * such a clock. The parent's parent is registered last, while the + * parent and its child are registered in that order. The intermediate + * and leaf clocks will thus be orphan when registered, but the leaf + * clock itself will always have its parent and will never be + * reparented. Indeed, it's only orphan because its parent is. + * + * These tests exercise the behaviour of the consumer API when dealing + * with an orphan clock, and how we deal with the transition to a valid + * parent. + */ +static struct kunit_suite +clk_orphan_two_level_root_last_test_suite = { + .name = "clk-orphan-two-level-root-last-test", + .init = clk_orphan_two_level_root_last_test_init, + .exit = clk_orphan_two_level_root_last_test_exit, + .test_cases = clk_orphan_two_level_root_last_test_cases, +}; + /* * Test that clk_set_rate_range won't return an error for a valid range * and that it will make sure the rate of the clock is within the @@ -1663,6 +1893,7 @@ kunit_test_suites( &clk_multiple_parents_mux_test_suite, &clk_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_test_suite, &clk_orphan_transparent_single_parent_test_suite, + &clk_orphan_two_level_root_last_test_suite, &clk_range_test_suite, &clk_range_maximize_test_suite, &clk_range_minimize_test_suite, -- 2.35.1