public inbox for linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
To: Mike Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>,
	Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com>,
	Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>,
	Yassine Oudjana <y.oudjana@protonmail.com>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>,
	Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Subject: [PATCH v3 28/28] clk: tests: Add missing test case for ranges
Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 16:42:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220511144249.354775-29-maxime@cerno.tech> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220511144249.354775-1-maxime@cerno.tech>

Let's add a test on the rate range after a reparenting. This fails for
now, but it's worth having it to document the corner cases we don't
support yet.

Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
---
 drivers/clk/clk_test.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk_test.c b/drivers/clk/clk_test.c
index b4ae6eec7758..8226f2c6c8a3 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk_test.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk_test.c
@@ -488,9 +488,61 @@ clk_test_multiple_parents_mux_has_parent(struct kunit *test)
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, clk_has_parent(clk, ctx->parents_ctx[1].hw.clk));
 }
 
+/*
+ * Test that for a clock with a multiple parents, if we set a range on
+ * that clock and the parent is changed, its rate after the reparenting
+ * is still within the range we asked for.
+ *
+ * FIXME: clk_set_parent() only does the reparenting but doesn't
+ * reevaluate whether the new clock rate is within its boundaries or
+ * not.
+ */
+static void
+clk_test_multiple_parents_mux_set_range_set_parent_get_rate(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct clk_multiple_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv;
+	struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw;
+	struct clk *clk = hw->clk;
+	struct clk *parent1, *parent2;
+	unsigned long rate;
+	int ret;
+
+	kunit_skip(test, "This needs to be fixed in the core.");
+
+	parent1 = clk_hw_get_clk(&ctx->parents_ctx[0].hw, NULL);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, parent1);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, clk_is_match(clk_get_parent(clk), parent1));
+
+	parent2 = clk_hw_get_clk(&ctx->parents_ctx[1].hw, NULL);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, parent2);
+
+	ret = clk_set_rate(parent1, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
+	ret = clk_set_rate(parent2, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
+	ret = clk_set_rate_range(clk,
+				 DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 - 1000,
+				 DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 + 1000);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
+	ret = clk_set_parent(clk, parent2);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
+	rate = clk_get_rate(clk);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_GE(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 - 1000);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_LE(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 + 1000);
+
+	clk_put(parent2);
+	clk_put(parent1);
+}
+
 static struct kunit_case clk_multiple_parents_mux_test_cases[] = {
 	KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_multiple_parents_mux_get_parent),
 	KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_multiple_parents_mux_has_parent),
+	KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_multiple_parents_mux_set_range_set_parent_get_rate),
 	{}
 };
 
-- 
2.36.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-05-11 14:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-11 14:42 [PATCH v3 00/28] clk: More clock rate fixes and tests Maxime Ripard
2022-05-11 14:42 ` [PATCH v3 01/28] clk: Drop the rate range on clk_put() Maxime Ripard
2022-05-11 14:42 ` [PATCH v3 02/28] clk: Skip clamping when rounding if there's no boundaries Maxime Ripard
2022-05-11 14:42 ` [PATCH v3 03/28] clk: Introduce clk_get_rate_range() Maxime Ripard
2022-05-11 14:42 ` [PATCH v3 04/28] drm/vc4: hdmi: Rework hdmi_enable_4kp60 detection Maxime Ripard
2022-05-11 14:42 ` [PATCH v3 05/28] clk: Mention that .recalc_rate can return 0 on error Maxime Ripard
2022-05-11 14:42 ` [PATCH v3 06/28] clk: Clarify clk_get_rate() expectations Maxime Ripard
2022-05-11 14:42 ` [PATCH v3 07/28] clk: tests: Add test suites description Maxime Ripard
2022-05-11 14:42 ` [PATCH v3 08/28] clk: tests: Add reference to the orphan mux bug report Maxime Ripard
2022-05-11 14:42 ` [PATCH v3 09/28] clk: tests: Add tests for uncached clock Maxime Ripard
2022-05-11 14:42 ` [PATCH v3 10/28] clk: tests: Add tests for single parent mux Maxime Ripard
2022-05-11 14:42 ` [PATCH v3 11/28] clk: tests: Add tests for mux with multiple parents Maxime Ripard
2022-05-11 14:42 ` [PATCH v3 12/28] clk: tests: Add some tests for orphan " Maxime Ripard
2022-05-11 14:42 ` [PATCH v3 13/28] clk: Take into account uncached clocks in clk_set_rate_range() Maxime Ripard
2022-05-11 14:42 ` [PATCH v3 14/28] clk: Fix clk_get_parent() documentation Maxime Ripard
2022-05-11 14:42 ` [PATCH v3 15/28] clk: Set req_rate on reparenting Maxime Ripard
2022-05-11 14:42 ` [PATCH v3 16/28] clk: Change clk_core_init_rate_req prototype Maxime Ripard
2022-05-11 14:42 ` [PATCH v3 17/28] clk: Move clk_core_init_rate_req() from clk_core_round_rate_nolock() to its caller Maxime Ripard
2022-05-11 14:42 ` [PATCH v3 18/28] clk: Introduce clk_hw_init_rate_request() Maxime Ripard
2022-05-11 14:42 ` [PATCH v3 19/28] clk: Add our request boundaries in clk_core_init_rate_req Maxime Ripard
2022-05-11 14:42 ` [PATCH v3 20/28] clk: Switch from __clk_determine_rate to clk_core_round_rate_nolock Maxime Ripard
2022-05-11 14:42 ` [PATCH v3 21/28] clk: Introduce clk_core_has_parent() Maxime Ripard
2022-05-11 14:42 ` [PATCH v3 22/28] clk: Stop forwarding clk_rate_requests to the parent Maxime Ripard
2022-05-11 19:21   ` kernel test robot
2022-05-11 19:21   ` kernel test robot
2022-05-11 20:23   ` kernel test robot
2022-05-11 21:25   ` kernel test robot
2022-05-11 14:42 ` [PATCH v3 23/28] clk: Zero the clk_rate_request structure Maxime Ripard
2022-05-11 14:42 ` [PATCH v3 24/28] clk: Test the clock pointer in clk_hw_get_name() Maxime Ripard
2022-05-11 14:42 ` [PATCH v3 25/28] clk: Introduce the clk_hw_get_rate_range function Maxime Ripard
2022-05-11 14:42 ` [PATCH v3 26/28] clk: qcom: clk-rcg2: Take clock boundaries into consideration for gfx3d Maxime Ripard
2022-05-11 14:42 ` [PATCH v3 27/28] clk: tests: Add some tests for clk_get_rate_range() Maxime Ripard
2022-05-11 14:42 ` Maxime Ripard [this message]
2022-05-11 14:48 ` [PATCH v3 00/28] clk: More clock rate fixes and tests Maxime Ripard
2022-06-03 14:30   ` Maxime Ripard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220511144249.354775-29-maxime@cerno.tech \
    --to=maxime@cerno.tech \
    --cc=alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com \
    --cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
    --cc=jbrunet@baylibre.com \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=naresh.kamboju@linaro.org \
    --cc=narmstrong@baylibre.com \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=y.oudjana@protonmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox