From: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org>
To: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
Cc: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
Chanho Park <chanho61.park@samsung.com>,
David Virag <virag.david003@gmail.com>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/6] clk: samsung: Add PM support for ARM64 Exynos chips
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2023 00:09:18 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230203060924.8257-1-semen.protsenko@linaro.org> (raw)
In order to prepare for PM enablement in clk-exynos850, common PM code
was extracted from clk-exynos5433 to clk-exynos-arm64. Also some related
cleanups were done prior to that. More specifically:
- patches #1..5: cleanups
- patch #6: PM code extraction
During the extraction of the exynos5433_cmu_probe() content to
exynos_arm64_register_cmu_pm() some code was reworked a bit, and also
split into smaller functions. In particular:
- cmu_data structure now contains a pointer to ctx, which is now
allocated in samsung_clk_init()
- cmu_data structure initialization was moved into separate function
- code for configuring gate clocks was added (optional)
Which in turn resulted in somehow modified code of probe function:
Original
--------
...
devm_platform_ioremap_resource(...);
samsung_clk_init(...);
exynos_arm64_cmu_prepare_pm(...);
exynos_arm64_enable_bus_clk(...);
platform_set_drvdata(...);
...
Modified
--------
...
platform_set_drvdata(...);
exynos_arm64_cmu_prepare_pm(...);
exynos_arm64_enable_bus_clk(...);
exynos_arm64_init_clocks(...);
devm_platform_ioremap_resource(...);
samsung_clk_init(...);
...
That shouldn't really change the logic or mode of operation. It was
preliminary tested on Exynos850 based board, with some extra patches on
top of this series (will be submitted later).
Marek, could you please test these patches on Exynos5433 platform, and
also review accordingly?
Thanks!
Sam Protsenko (6):
clk: samsung: Don't pass reg_base to samsung_clk_register_pll()
clk: samsung: Remove np argument from samsung_clk_init()
clk: samsung: Set dev in samsung_clk_init()
clk: samsung: Extract clocks registration to common function
clk: samsung: Extract parent clock enabling to common function
clk: samsung: exynos5433: Extract PM support to common ARM64 layer
drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos-arm64.c | 219 +++++++++++++++++++++--
drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos-arm64.h | 3 +
drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c | 6 +-
drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4412-isp.c | 3 +-
drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c | 5 +-
drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c | 5 +-
drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5433.c | 157 +---------------
drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c | 11 +-
drivers/clk/samsung/clk-s3c2410.c | 6 +-
drivers/clk/samsung/clk-s3c2412.c | 5 +-
drivers/clk/samsung/clk-s3c2443.c | 6 +-
drivers/clk/samsung/clk-s3c64xx.c | 4 +-
drivers/clk/samsung/clk-s5pv210.c | 6 +-
drivers/clk/samsung/clk.c | 64 ++++---
drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h | 10 +-
15 files changed, 282 insertions(+), 228 deletions(-)
--
2.39.0
next reply other threads:[~2023-02-03 6:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20230203060905eucas1p20dc8b2dbf93ec2b0c604bd461afbae94@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2023-02-03 6:09 ` Sam Protsenko [this message]
2023-02-03 6:09 ` [PATCH 1/6] clk: samsung: Don't pass reg_base to samsung_clk_register_pll() Sam Protsenko
2023-02-03 6:09 ` [PATCH 2/6] clk: samsung: Remove np argument from samsung_clk_init() Sam Protsenko
2023-02-03 6:09 ` [PATCH 3/6] clk: samsung: Set dev in samsung_clk_init() Sam Protsenko
2023-02-03 6:09 ` [PATCH 4/6] clk: samsung: Extract clocks registration to common function Sam Protsenko
2023-02-03 6:09 ` [PATCH 5/6] clk: samsung: Extract parent clock enabling " Sam Protsenko
2023-02-03 9:14 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-02-08 6:00 ` Sam Protsenko
2023-02-03 6:09 ` [PATCH 6/6] clk: samsung: exynos5433: Extract PM support to common ARM64 layer Sam Protsenko
2023-02-03 9:18 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-02-08 6:08 ` Sam Protsenko
2023-02-03 12:19 ` kernel test robot
2023-02-03 14:33 ` [PATCH 0/6] clk: samsung: Add PM support for ARM64 Exynos chips Marek Szyprowski
2023-02-08 6:05 ` Sam Protsenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230203060924.8257-1-semen.protsenko@linaro.org \
--to=semen.protsenko@linaro.org \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=chanho61.park@samsung.com \
--cc=cw00.choi@samsung.com \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=s.nawrocki@samsung.com \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
--cc=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
--cc=virag.david003@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox