From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90739C77B61 for ; Mon, 24 Apr 2023 17:18:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231794AbjDXRSJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Apr 2023 13:18:09 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47884 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232105AbjDXRSG (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Apr 2023 13:18:06 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81AD86187; Mon, 24 Apr 2023 10:18:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1682356681; x=1713892681; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=S/X2H/mlqZImO3F3tj7Tw3KTKqYXWQ1Zao3DMIW39tA=; b=gDZA4LT5+bt2gX08HWTeprsjH7FUQM1HjqMHkMncJrRFrT8lVW4IOMru Tnx0Xe5AZHufNbFlr7ChJomoFKHGAQQ9LU+Gr24Sl6/FFNYk7W2FBbCXe m9sBLo4K9FJvgiI1SDxJyUB7KjgGeVdl1qeHEdr05PM6oVOWudjw6z8Fe d3OZLjvcnIRJPDv6mBoYnjsXZ0S6NVskjSbqmdGvnQ1lkpl/i94LsQ37C z2nvmD3PGuEPAPXkv+F1FZZjQU4CosjkSDbw4ozruv7ergQ/sUWAO+P7U InNUU2DsfDII1JtRb05+3rtQMK/XYazMBnS2/tkmzNdr6KdJ0g9rQYeET Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10690"; a="374458913" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.99,223,1677571200"; d="scan'208";a="374458913" Received: from orsmga006.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.51]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Apr 2023 10:18:00 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10690"; a="670574815" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.99,223,1677571200"; d="scan'208";a="670574815" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO b613635ddfff) ([10.239.97.150]) by orsmga006.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 Apr 2023 10:17:57 -0700 Received: from kbuild by b613635ddfff with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1pqzp7-000iZu-0S; Mon, 24 Apr 2023 17:17:57 +0000 Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 01:17:25 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Nikita Shubin Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Arnd Bergmann , Linus Walleij , Alexander Sverdlin , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/43] clk: ep93xx: add DT support for Cirrus EP93xx Message-ID: <202304250013.c9Px2Npt-lkp@intel.com> References: <20230424123522.18302-13-nikita.shubin@maquefel.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230424123522.18302-13-nikita.shubin@maquefel.me> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org Hi Nikita, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on soc/for-next] [also build test ERROR on robh/for-next linusw-pinctrl/devel linusw-pinctrl/for-next linus/master v6.3] [cannot apply to next-20230421] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Nikita-Shubin/gpio-ep93xx-split-device-in-multiple/20230424-183649 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/soc/soc.git for-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230424123522.18302-13-nikita.shubin%40maquefel.me patch subject: [PATCH 12/43] clk: ep93xx: add DT support for Cirrus EP93xx config: sparc-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230425/202304250013.c9Px2Npt-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: sparc64-linux-gcc (GCC) 12.1.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/8621eda93e4a641c57f889ac36d2386482e92157 git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux git fetch --no-tags linux-review Nikita-Shubin/gpio-ep93xx-split-device-in-multiple/20230424-183649 git checkout 8621eda93e4a641c57f889ac36d2386482e92157 # save the config file mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-12.1.0 make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=sparc olddefconfig COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-12.1.0 make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=sparc SHELL=/bin/bash drivers/ If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202304250013.c9Px2Npt-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): drivers/clk/clk-ep93xx.c: In function 'ep93xx_clk_enable': >> drivers/clk/clk-ep93xx.c:153:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'ep93xx_syscon_swlocked_write' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 153 | ep93xx_syscon_swlocked_write(val, psc->reg); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ cc1: some warnings being treated as errors vim +/ep93xx_syscon_swlocked_write +153 drivers/clk/clk-ep93xx.c 140 141 static int ep93xx_clk_enable(struct clk_hw *hw) 142 { 143 struct clk_psc *psc = to_clk_psc(hw); 144 unsigned long flags = 0; 145 u32 val; 146 147 if (psc->lock) 148 spin_lock_irqsave(psc->lock, flags); 149 150 ep93xx_regmap_read(psc->reg, &val); 151 val |= BIT(psc->bit_idx); 152 > 153 ep93xx_syscon_swlocked_write(val, psc->reg); 154 155 if (psc->lock) 156 spin_unlock_irqrestore(psc->lock, flags); 157 158 return 0; 159 } 160 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests