From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail5.25mail.st (mail5.25mail.st [74.50.62.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C22E2CCB4; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 05:48:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=74.50.62.9 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709185723; cv=none; b=pLhEQTAcMu5yAYIZ5F5wErJdaH0+4d8I/sCzNE79FXPtW1hrcDNYMYg2If5lfGrerEhI3Cof9fg7O5iemRJLA035+0xMs9wn9wa4eZP1T3dwLicY2UK+gFKKThQ1yUcct92IEMW+mofMyz5S4uoqPBjpUjz8k0bFZcf3hajFb5Q= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709185723; c=relaxed/simple; bh=tDQKgdaHcpbkKuo/kf6JeayU7YHnwAHOd5IVTL7HkJk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=jVifNoZvsPhcKE7mstAniAkfq27SZE1HcBPLN2lulqlRC6dseNTcNeA1z8DljxAoCDC41oBd0f7NXZDZcq0XcWwwvClbE+g5zZIy82RAgncpyA4vDILpLC+PzSbqEnqu8IvOoliL+B/sQqNGNOApxcELhq3NKUq8sQDqdiTWojg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=atomide.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=atomide.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=atomide.com header.i=@atomide.com header.b=sF65JYxY; arc=none smtp.client-ip=74.50.62.9 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=atomide.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=atomide.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=atomide.com header.i=@atomide.com header.b="sF65JYxY" Received: from localhost (91-158-86-216.elisa-laajakaista.fi [91.158.86.216]) by mail5.25mail.st (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5ED7C6045F; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 05:48:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=atomide.com; s=25mailst; t=1709185718; bh=tDQKgdaHcpbkKuo/kf6JeayU7YHnwAHOd5IVTL7HkJk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=sF65JYxYrDt48aFF3Agq0mdF9wwwsusp4wAkXtttjH+J2wUdGDAxBJd1nvjHF/G+a znvPAaCDDywsOK41KhnW55QfJO57e9CsVXIcVUQOwU4LG+CRcc16YUiuGRsrBvoYmo bachV/qV5xsgTi+FB9PmKXn5aP7K7bLOkscBGKNJMuPi4xz9bJPBwmK5Sk7XuvqFiM hDBjOpwLq7XCngakzPcu/potKcsYrdFo6kAubuVl8DaIjRcUNAzVWsu3Ie36/85iXz wkIkkgb/bCMBERxV8ms1/tUuF1qZ5NWQf4QtniMoBxDpzBttO3qUSMtZg/U0KlBSER fJgO9wx07V/NQ== Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 07:48:10 +0200 From: Tony Lindgren To: Stephen Boyd Cc: Bjorn Andersson , Conor Dooley , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Mathieu Poirier , Michael Turquette , Rob Herring , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: clock: ti: remove unstable remark Message-ID: <20240229054810.GG52537@atomide.com> References: <20240224091236.10146-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> <20240224091236.10146-2-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> <2df72cc0d2be877c1f6eda8ebcf79508.sboyd@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2df72cc0d2be877c1f6eda8ebcf79508.sboyd@kernel.org> * Stephen Boyd [240228 22:59]: > +Tony > > Quoting Krzysztof Kozlowski (2024-02-24 01:12:35) > > Several TI SoC clock bindings were marked as work-in-progress / unstable > > between 2013-2016, for example in commit f60b1ea5ea7a ("CLK: TI: add > > support for gate clock"). It was enough of time to consider them stable > > and expect usual ABI rules. > > > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski > > --- > > Acked-by: Stephen Boyd Makes sense to me: Acked-by: Tony Lindgren