From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
To: Alexander Dahl <ada@thorsis.com>
Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>,
Codrin Ciubotariu <codrin.ciubotariu@microchip.com>,
Sandeep Sheriker Mallikarjun
<sandeepsheriker.mallikarjun@microchip.com>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: dts: microchip: sam9x60: Fix rtc/rtt clocks
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 01:52:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240821235205b302068b@mail.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240821055136.6858-1-ada@thorsis.com>
On 21/08/2024 07:51:36+0200, Alexander Dahl wrote:
> The RTC and RTT peripherals use the "timing domain slow clock (TD_SLCK),
> sourced from the 32.768 kHz crystal oscillator.
>
> (The previously used Monitoring domain slow clock (MD_SLCK) is sourced
> from an internal RC oscillator which is most probably not precise enough
> for real time clock purposes.)
>
> Fixes: 1e5f532c2737 ("ARM: dts: at91: sam9x60: add device tree for soc and board")
> Fixes: 5f6b33f46346 ("ARM: dts: sam9x60: add rtt")
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Dahl <ada@thorsis.com>
> ---
>
> Notes:
> Picked the wrong patch in the first try. This v2 one has a slightly
> adapted commit message and more context below.
>
> This obviously requires a 32.768 kHz crystal oscillator to be present,
> but the sam9x60.dtsi does contain that, and the clock-controllers
> reference that, so I assume it's always present.
The crystal is optional so this is going to break the boards that don't
have one. I don't really mind but this should probably be part of the
commit message.
This makes me realise that we always assumed the RC oscillator was
running at 32768 while the sam9x60 datasheet refers to it has a 32kHz
oscillator. However the RTC only has a 32768 divider...
>
> /sys/kernel/debug/clk/clk_summary content excerpt before:
>
> slow_rc_osc 1 1 0 32768 93750000 0 50000 Y deviceless no_connection_id
> md_slck 4 4 0 32768 0 0 50000 Y fffffea8.rtc no_connection_id
> fffffe20.rtc no_connection_id
> fffffe10.poweroff no_connection_id
> fffffe00.reset-controller no_connection_id
> timer@f8008000 slow_clk
> deviceless no_connection_id
> …
> slow_xtal 0 0 0 32768 0 0 50000 Y deviceless no_connection_id
> slow_osc 0 0 0 32768 0 0 50000 Y deviceless no_connection_id
> td_slck 0 0 0 32768 0 0 50000 Y deviceless no_connection_id
>
> And after:
>
> slow_rc_osc 1 1 0 32768 93750000 0 50000 Y deviceless no_connection_id
> md_slck 2 2 0 32768 0 0 50000 Y fffffe10.poweroff no_connection_id
> fffffe00.reset-controller no_connection_id
> timer@f8008000 slow_clk
> deviceless no_connection_id
> …
> slow_xtal 1 1 0 32768 0 0 50000 Y deviceless no_connection_id
> slow_osc 1 1 0 32768 0 0 50000 Y deviceless no_connection_id
> td_slck 2 2 0 32768 0 0 50000 Y fffffea8.rtc no_connection_id
> fffffe20.rtc no_connection_id
> deviceless no_connection_id
>
> arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/sam9x60.dtsi | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/sam9x60.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/sam9x60.dtsi
> index 291540e5d81e..d077afd5024d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/sam9x60.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/sam9x60.dtsi
> @@ -1312,7 +1312,7 @@ rtt: rtc@fffffe20 {
> compatible = "microchip,sam9x60-rtt", "atmel,at91sam9260-rtt";
> reg = <0xfffffe20 0x20>;
> interrupts = <1 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 7>;
> - clocks = <&clk32k 0>;
> + clocks = <&clk32k 1>;
> };
>
> pit: timer@fffffe40 {
> @@ -1338,7 +1338,7 @@ rtc: rtc@fffffea8 {
> compatible = "microchip,sam9x60-rtc", "atmel,at91sam9x5-rtc";
> reg = <0xfffffea8 0x100>;
> interrupts = <1 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 7>;
> - clocks = <&clk32k 0>;
> + clocks = <&clk32k 1>;
> };
>
> watchdog: watchdog@ffffff80 {
>
> base-commit: 47ac09b91befbb6a235ab620c32af719f8208399
> --
> 2.39.2
>
--
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-21 23:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-20 13:27 [PATCH] ARM: dts: microchip: sam9x60: Fix rtc/rtt clock parent Alexander Dahl
2024-08-21 5:51 ` [PATCH v2] ARM: dts: microchip: sam9x60: Fix rtc/rtt clocks Alexander Dahl
2024-08-21 23:52 ` Alexandre Belloni [this message]
2024-08-22 6:53 ` Alexander Dahl
2024-08-22 8:17 ` Alexandre Belloni
2024-08-22 10:25 ` Alexander Dahl
2024-08-24 17:28 ` claudiu beznea
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240821235205b302068b@mail.local \
--to=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=ada@thorsis.com \
--cc=claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev \
--cc=codrin.ciubotariu@microchip.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sandeepsheriker.mallikarjun@microchip.com \
--cc=tudor.ambarus@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox