Re: [PATCH v5 4/7] dt-bindings: media: camss: Add qcom,sdm670-camss

Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-10-01T09:47:50Z

On 01/10/2024 11:09, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 01/10/2024 07:53, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> + reg-names:
>>> + items:
>>> + - const: csiphy0
>>> + - const: csiphy1
>>> + - const: csiphy2
>>> + - const: vfe0
>>> + - const: csid0
>>> + - const: vfe1
>>> + - const: csid1
>>> + - const: vfe_lite
>>> + - const: csid2
>> Why this order is so different than all others? This is supposed to
>> match other devices. Look at sdm845 for example.
>
> These are appearing in address order, which is preferred over reg-name
> ordering AFAIU.

First time I hear about such rule. Where is this ordering preference
documented? We always ask to keep the same order in each file.

Best regards,
Krzysztof