From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Umer Uddin <umer.uddin@mentallysanemainliners.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Igor Belwon <igor.belwon@mentallysanemainliners.org>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] clk: samsung: exynos990: Add CMU_HSI1 block
Date: Thu, 29 May 2025 07:17:03 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202505290752.ccgBnlpc-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250528105252.157533-3-umer.uddin@mentallysanemainliners.org>
Hi Umer,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on krzk/for-next]
[also build test WARNING on krzk-dt/for-next clk/clk-next linus/master v6.15 next-20250528]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Umer-Uddin/dt-bindings-clock-exynos990-Add-CMU_HSI1-bindings/20250528-185847
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/krzk/linux.git for-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250528105252.157533-3-umer.uddin%40mentallysanemainliners.org
patch subject: [PATCH v1 2/2] clk: samsung: exynos990: Add CMU_HSI1 block
config: arm-randconfig-002-20250529 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250529/202505290752.ccgBnlpc-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (GCC) 8.5.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250529/202505290752.ccgBnlpc-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202505290752.ccgBnlpc-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos990.c:15:
>> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos990.c:1666:7: warning: 'mout_hsi1_mmc_card_p' defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
PNAME(mout_hsi1_mmc_card_p) = { "oscclk",
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h:237:44: note: in definition of macro 'PNAME'
#define PNAME(x) static const char * const x[] __initconst
^
>> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos990.c:1658:7: warning: 'mout_hsi1_bus_p' defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
PNAME(mout_hsi1_bus_p) = { "dout_cmu_shared0_div3",
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h:237:44: note: in definition of macro 'PNAME'
#define PNAME(x) static const char * const x[] __initconst
^
>> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos990.c:1657:7: warning: 'mout_hsi1_pcie_p' defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
PNAME(mout_hsi1_pcie_p) = { "oscclk", "fout_shared2_pll" };
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h:237:44: note: in definition of macro 'PNAME'
#define PNAME(x) static const char * const x[] __initconst
^
>> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos990.c:1653:7: warning: 'mout_hsi1_ufs_card_p' defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
PNAME(mout_hsi1_ufs_card_p) = { "oscclk",
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h:237:44: note: in definition of macro 'PNAME'
#define PNAME(x) static const char * const x[] __initconst
^
>> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos990.c:1649:7: warning: 'mout_hsi1_ufs_embd_p' defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
PNAME(mout_hsi1_ufs_embd_p) = { "oscclk",
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h:237:44: note: in definition of macro 'PNAME'
#define PNAME(x) static const char * const x[] __initconst
^
vim +/mout_hsi1_mmc_card_p +1666 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos990.c
1647
1648 /* Parent clock list for CMU_HSI1 muxes */
> 1649 PNAME(mout_hsi1_ufs_embd_p) = { "oscclk",
1650 "dout_cmu_shared0_div4",
1651 "dout_cmu_shared2_div2",
1652 "oscclk" };
> 1653 PNAME(mout_hsi1_ufs_card_p) = { "oscclk",
1654 "dout_cmu_shared0_div4",
1655 "dout_cmu_shared2_div2",
1656 "oscclk" };
> 1657 PNAME(mout_hsi1_pcie_p) = { "oscclk", "fout_shared2_pll" };
> 1658 PNAME(mout_hsi1_bus_p) = { "dout_cmu_shared0_div3",
1659 "dout_cmu_shared0_div4",
1660 "dout_cmu_shared1_div4",
1661 "dout_cmu_shared4_div3",
1662 "dout_cmu_shared2_div2",
1663 "fout_mmc_pll",
1664 "oscclk",
1665 "oscclk" };
> 1666 PNAME(mout_hsi1_mmc_card_p) = { "oscclk",
1667 "fout_shared2_pll",
1668 "fout_mmc_pll",
1669 "dout_cmu_shared0_div4" };
1670 PNAME(mout_hsi1_bus_user_p) = { "oscclk", "dout_cmu_hsi1_bus" };
1671 PNAME(mout_hsi1_mmc_card_user_p) = { "oscclk", "dout_cmu_hsi1_mmc_card" };
1672 PNAME(mout_hsi1_pcie_user_p) = { "oscclk", "dout_cmu_hsi1_pcie" };
1673 PNAME(mout_hsi1_ufs_card_user_p) = { "oscclk", "dout_cmu_hsi1_ufs_card" };
1674 PNAME(mout_hsi1_ufs_embd_user_p) = { "oscclk", "dout_cmu_hsi1_ufs_embd" };
1675
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-28 23:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-28 10:52 [PATCH v1 0/2] Add CMU_HSI1 support for Exynos990 SoC Umer Uddin
2025-05-28 10:52 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] dt-bindings: clock: exynos990: Add CMU_HSI1 bindings Umer Uddin
2025-05-28 10:52 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] clk: samsung: exynos990: Add CMU_HSI1 block Umer Uddin
2025-05-28 23:17 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2025-06-12 15:14 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202505290752.ccgBnlpc-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=cw00.choi@samsung.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=igor.belwon@mentallysanemainliners.org \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=s.nawrocki@samsung.com \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=umer.uddin@mentallysanemainliners.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox