public inbox for linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>
To: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	 Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
	 Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC v4 04/12] clk: test: introduce test suite for sibling rate changes on a divider
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2025 10:39:23 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250923-clk-tests-docs-v4-4-9205cb3d3cba@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250923-clk-tests-docs-v4-0-9205cb3d3cba@redhat.com>

Introduce a test suite that creates a parent with two divider-only
children, and ensure that changing the rate of one child does not
affect the rate of the sibling. Some of the tests are disabled
until the underlying issue is fixed in the clk core.

Signed-off-by: Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/clk/clk_test.c | 145 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 145 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk_test.c b/drivers/clk/clk_test.c
index e1f72fcede1df1d486744b171728231ec8fa8836..1aca266f9922beb7d81124c07d21b2a3d700dc5c 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk_test.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk_test.c
@@ -653,6 +653,150 @@ clk_multiple_parents_mux_test_suite = {
 	.test_cases = clk_multiple_parents_mux_test_cases,
 };
 
+struct clk_rate_change_sibling_div_div_context {
+	struct clk_dummy_context parent;
+	struct clk_dummy_div child1, child2;
+	struct clk *parent_clk, *child1_clk, *child2_clk;
+};
+
+static int clk_rate_change_sibling_div_div_test_init(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct clk_rate_change_sibling_div_div_context *ctx;
+	int ret;
+
+	ctx = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!ctx)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	test->priv = ctx;
+
+	ctx->parent.hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT_NO_PARENT("parent", &clk_dummy_rate_ops, 0);
+	ctx->parent.rate = 24 * HZ_PER_MHZ;
+	ret = clk_hw_register_kunit(test, NULL, &ctx->parent.hw);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	ctx->child1.hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT_HW("child1", &ctx->parent.hw, &clk_dummy_div_ops,
+					     CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT);
+	ctx->child1.div = 1;
+	ret = clk_hw_register_kunit(test, NULL, &ctx->child1.hw);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	ctx->child2.hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT_HW("child2", &ctx->parent.hw, &clk_dummy_div_ops,
+					     CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT);
+	ctx->child2.div = 1;
+	ret = clk_hw_register_kunit(test, NULL, &ctx->child2.hw);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	ctx->parent_clk = clk_hw_get_clk(&ctx->parent.hw, NULL);
+	ctx->child1_clk = clk_hw_get_clk(&ctx->child1.hw, NULL);
+	ctx->child2_clk = clk_hw_get_clk(&ctx->child2.hw, NULL);
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, clk_get_rate(ctx->parent_clk), 24 * HZ_PER_MHZ);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, clk_get_rate(ctx->child1_clk), 24 * HZ_PER_MHZ);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, clk_get_rate(ctx->child2_clk), 24 * HZ_PER_MHZ);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void clk_rate_change_sibling_div_div_test_exit(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct clk_rate_change_sibling_div_div_context *ctx = test->priv;
+
+	clk_put(ctx->parent_clk);
+	clk_put(ctx->child1_clk);
+	clk_put(ctx->child2_clk);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Test that, for a parent with two divider-only children with CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT set
+ * and one requests a rate compatible with the existing parent rate, the parent and
+ * sibling rates are not affected.
+ */
+static void clk_test_rate_change_sibling_div_div_1(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct clk_rate_change_sibling_div_div_context *ctx = test->priv;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = clk_set_rate(ctx->child1_clk, 6 * HZ_PER_MHZ);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, clk_get_rate(ctx->parent_clk), 24 * HZ_PER_MHZ);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, clk_get_rate(ctx->child1_clk), 6 * HZ_PER_MHZ);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ctx->child1.div, 4);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, clk_get_rate(ctx->child2_clk), 24 * HZ_PER_MHZ);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ctx->child2.div, 1);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Test that, for a parent with two divider-only children with CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT
+ * set and one requests a rate incompatible with the existing parent rate, the
+ * sibling rate is not affected. The requested child rate picks a parent rate
+ * that's compatible with both children.
+ */
+static void clk_test_rate_change_sibling_div_div_2(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct clk_rate_change_sibling_div_div_context *ctx = test->priv;
+	int ret;
+
+	kunit_skip(test, "This needs to be fixed in the core.");
+
+	ret = clk_set_rate(ctx->child1_clk, 48 * HZ_PER_MHZ);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, clk_get_rate(ctx->parent_clk), 48 * HZ_PER_MHZ);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, clk_get_rate(ctx->child1_clk), 48 * HZ_PER_MHZ);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ctx->child1.div, 1);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, clk_get_rate(ctx->child2_clk), 24 * HZ_PER_MHZ);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ctx->child2.div, 2);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Test that, for a parent with two divider-only children with CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT
+ * set and one requests a rate incompatible with the existing parent rate, the
+ * sibling rate is not affected. The requested child rates require a parent rate
+ * that neither child would initially pick.
+ */
+static void clk_test_rate_change_sibling_div_div_3(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct clk_rate_change_sibling_div_div_context *ctx = test->priv;
+	int ret;
+
+	kunit_skip(test, "This needs to be fixed in the core.");
+
+	ret = clk_set_rate(ctx->child1_clk, 32 * HZ_PER_MHZ);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
+	ret = clk_set_rate(ctx->child2_clk, 48 * HZ_PER_MHZ);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, clk_get_rate(ctx->parent_clk), 96 * HZ_PER_MHZ);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, clk_get_rate(ctx->child1_clk), 32 * HZ_PER_MHZ);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ctx->child1.div, 3);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, clk_get_rate(ctx->child2_clk), 48 * HZ_PER_MHZ);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ctx->child2.div, 2);
+}
+
+static struct kunit_case clk_rate_change_sibling_div_div_cases[] = {
+	KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_rate_change_sibling_div_div_1),
+	KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_rate_change_sibling_div_div_2),
+	KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_rate_change_sibling_div_div_3),
+	{}
+};
+
+/*
+ * Test suite that creates a parent with two divider-only children, and
+ * ensures that changing the rate of one child does not affect the rate
+ * of the other child.
+ */
+static struct kunit_suite clk_rate_change_sibling_div_div_test_suite = {
+	.name = "clk-rate-change-sibling-div-div",
+	.init = clk_rate_change_sibling_div_div_test_init,
+	.exit = clk_rate_change_sibling_div_div_test_exit,
+	.test_cases = clk_rate_change_sibling_div_div_cases,
+};
+
 static int
 clk_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_test_init(struct kunit *test)
 {
@@ -3593,6 +3737,7 @@ kunit_test_suites(
 	&clk_leaf_mux_set_rate_parent_test_suite,
 	&clk_test_suite,
 	&clk_multiple_parents_mux_test_suite,
+	&clk_rate_change_sibling_div_div_test_suite,
 	&clk_mux_no_reparent_test_suite,
 	&clk_mux_notifier_test_suite,
 	&clk_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_test_suite,

-- 
2.51.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-09-23 14:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-23 14:39 [PATCH RFC v4 00/12] clk: add support for v1 / v2 clock rate negotiation and kunit tests Brian Masney
2025-09-23 14:39 ` [PATCH RFC v4 01/12] clk: add kernel docs for struct clk_core Brian Masney
2025-09-23 14:39 ` [PATCH RFC v4 02/12] clk: test: convert constants to use HZ_PER_MHZ Brian Masney
2025-09-23 14:39 ` [PATCH RFC v4 03/12] clk: test: introduce clk_dummy_div for a mock divider Brian Masney
2025-09-23 14:39 ` Brian Masney [this message]
2025-09-23 14:39 ` [PATCH RFC v4 05/12] clk: test: introduce clk_dummy_gate for a mock gate Brian Masney
2025-09-23 14:39 ` [PATCH RFC v4 06/12] clk: test: introduce test suite for sibling rate changes on a gate Brian Masney
2025-09-23 14:39 ` [PATCH RFC v4 07/12] clk: test: introduce helper to create a mock mux Brian Masney
2025-09-23 14:39 ` [PATCH RFC v4 08/12] clk: test: introduce test variation for sibling rate changes on a mux Brian Masney
2025-09-23 14:39 ` [PATCH RFC v4 09/12] clk: test: introduce test variation for sibling rate changes on a gate/mux Brian Masney
2025-09-23 14:39 ` [PATCH RFC v4 10/12] clk: add support for v2 rate negotiation Brian Masney
2025-09-23 14:39 ` [PATCH RFC v4 11/12] clk: test: introduce negotiate_rates() op for clk_dummy and clk_dummy_div Brian Masney
2025-09-23 14:39 ` [PATCH RFC v4 12/12] clk: test: update divider kunit tests for v1 and v2 rate negotiation Brian Masney
2025-09-25 10:31 ` [PATCH RFC v4 00/12] clk: add support for v1 / v2 clock rate negotiation and kunit tests Brian Masney
2025-09-25 12:14 ` Maxime Ripard
2025-09-25 14:20   ` Brian Masney
2025-09-30 11:28     ` Maxime Ripard
2025-11-15  0:22       ` Brian Masney
2025-11-21 16:09         ` Maxime Ripard
2025-11-21 20:35           ` Brian Masney
2025-12-19  0:03             ` Follow up from Linux Plumbers about my clk rate change talk (was Re: [PATCH RFC v4 00/12] clk: add support for v1 / v2 clock rate negotiation and kunit tests) Brian Masney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250923-clk-tests-docs-v4-4-9205cb3d3cba@redhat.com \
    --to=bmasney@redhat.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=mripard@kernel.org \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox