From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11C9C2C0274; Mon, 8 Dec 2025 17:10:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765213840; cv=none; b=FOEJLt08h5opMT3ySiJSUEck4jqzF9Ahik6MvSNjXHEEdmdlnl2TQr4jHxvIlbzZb1BZLkbPawPF85VshvhL6QXEYt2NCqBoLpciuv4oAMdNX8v1PRmDME7WNaLKT3wuuPuilwcyYW+0TLCJ8rLwFNZKQWFH7TCNZqVfb2YaxKM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765213840; c=relaxed/simple; bh=HUczN0JOy5c/9Nhyo4/4Hy2U/dsetbWKARZVVXVoP9Q=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=TnOkP8TJwVVEiVFyZhic76rUWy0RNHDFinx+03Y9EDk9Gxw1M/7p7qIje/tY5qA7n66LSc84KwT1CUHEZAKkYYHGX4a/tJ6JRHy2V0kLAOZBdHU+12rKGdlD+/lEshemkjQHKXkRK/l8+OgF3RzFZ5EAcXFdSY3Es/B704XHGCA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=IomiSZG4; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="IomiSZG4" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3945AC4CEF1; Mon, 8 Dec 2025 17:10:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1765213839; bh=HUczN0JOy5c/9Nhyo4/4Hy2U/dsetbWKARZVVXVoP9Q=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=IomiSZG43h+0wzBvViLmonXggdL1L8miPSoGm147yGhfQYDIp64e1fJGYbESJXiy8 NqnE82zKagCuYc7xpcswOpSlliIJEg0He+IwQY++G7PcYLdtKJhoBW3Evg2tjAvV8x XAegUd63IVJ2e29Jh++NR/1f6koztv2A0KCs4TQW5Gf7i139Ysep8ATNbDgSdRDJ7n SpTRfbcamtXduMd1gLBdBMZ55NNPcnsQ4cQ2/i0NTitZyBp2sZ/lwz44rPSulZQhgH x4P8xHfiIK3N6cY5PY775Q0edhoVWQ4cdMQKCwk7KUfUIsIMjLZbTTC7ok5Wu/M18M h6ZG/jgxbklPA== Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2025 17:10:33 +0000 From: Conor Dooley To: Robert Marko Cc: robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, nicolas.ferre@microchip.com, claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev, mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@kernel.org, richardcochran@gmail.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, daniel.machon@microchip.com, UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, luka.perkov@sartura.hr Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] dt-bindings: arm: Document Microchip LAN969x Message-ID: <20251208-absolute-diploma-6575729ab43f@spud> References: <20251203122313.1287950-1-robert.marko@sartura.hr> <20251203122313.1287950-2-robert.marko@sartura.hr> <20251203-duly-leotard-86b83bd840c6@spud> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="f/ANzMaVIMozCDGI" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: --f/ANzMaVIMozCDGI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Dec 08, 2025 at 11:30:28AM +0100, Robert Marko wrote: > On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 8:19=E2=80=AFPM Conor Dooley wr= ote: > > > > On Wed, Dec 03, 2025 at 01:21:30PM +0100, Robert Marko wrote: > > > Microchip LAN969x is a series of multi-port, multi-gigabit switches b= ased > > > on ARMv8 Cortex-A53 CPU. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Robert Marko > > > --- > > > .../bindings/arm/microchip,lan969x.yaml | 32 +++++++++++++++++= ++ > > > > This should not be in a unique file, put it in with the other microchip > > arm devices please. Also, the wildcard in the compatible is not > > permitted, only way it'd make sense is if these are different binnings > > of the same silicon. If that's the case, you need to explain why, > > because compatibles are meant to be soc-specific. >=20 > Hi Conor, > The issue is that there is no unique place for Microchip SoC-s, > LAN966x series is in the AT91 bindings > while SparX-5 has its own bindings file. >=20 > What would you suggest in this case? Ideally, arm/atmel-at91.yaml and arm/microchip,sparx5.yaml would just become arm/microchip.yaml. The axi@600000000 thing in the sparx5 file looks pointless and can be deleted IMO. --f/ANzMaVIMozCDGI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYKAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCaTcGiQAKCRB4tDGHoIJi 0hJgAQDZXZvEtWbFycCBtjtvAkegJzipsK18lKX3sa/WHe6VoQEAzIrZMT4k0/6l bcJKf5xlAsTcmcBNT0hxrPSamMF+sA8= =rUuT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --f/ANzMaVIMozCDGI--