From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F6EA3D3D19; Mon, 9 Feb 2026 18:54:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770663270; cv=none; b=KL+In98DmpHabmEKONFsMp2x0Y5HIHmaloTobW6EKg71zPbjfdD4dwGPDHeilOq31YCm4wTAnF61o0oydIZ/1jCJsuPkfPbJoi/WtkiB+xFnAV+vvO9tctupy0S0zaoABmUbxUsVLmZpOOr0BDeKybh6dWh1YX1ujXGOR3JaOtM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770663270; c=relaxed/simple; bh=MrBkziRbJS86DaZ8nygHl1jop5eq6BoFgyTkgCQFQmI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=sesF7xnmzs0adA18vSNdAmL9nW0KEUwMg7JO9mcmfZ5YKE1H98EThiJYyM8OG1liBsaNoOZhgNlC6Zogpk5lTHZW0/HQQ36zvkBjiSni1I1wevzYbDjX/BYgJch3rOS0g+jHr9bPldgE70yzpQEPNFeoJQlWYCgUzPYNDpCvCVU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=BJHMt6Zb; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="BJHMt6Zb" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F0B4FC116C6; Mon, 9 Feb 2026 18:54:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1770663270; bh=MrBkziRbJS86DaZ8nygHl1jop5eq6BoFgyTkgCQFQmI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=BJHMt6Zb425EX9+bYEdJ3EqK9m0W+BlyWN8BlOvSZ+ZkFePXMRN5npOu37rS1/RNy l6v5HDFdW7SLKDnkRe5yS1+pPP1hFdjGYc/ytJ9gVYktuV7qBwfLwCs8aM7W6PWpTW yQMzqsoCtgCgjCNeBIfdRMLsZAucORkbdZK/3MYN2r3XKixU35xng7uczAgBP7aEDG ezBAQV8tZgs7508Y0NEEL5VGel/BR2hw+fh3I60aGNZyb1x0OkVON3lB34mxZlbqry IDVocZ4fD7EGHe8UyNpKrx/rzD9X+xMyHLC9E6LeQq4YgrGCVPRtnMd6+pFWK3QpMa mgGNQtZpt5zww== Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2026 18:54:23 +0000 From: Conor Dooley To: Anirudh Srinivasan Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Drew Fustini , Joel Stanley , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Philipp Zabel , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, joel@jms.id.au, fustini@kernel.org, mpe@kernel.org, mpe@oss.tenstorrent.com, npiggin@oss.tenstorrent.com, agross@kernel.org, agross@oss.tenstorrent.com, bmasney@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] dt-bindings: clk: tenstorrent: Add tenstorrent,atlantis-prcm Message-ID: <20260209-earwig-many-2473358f8a12@spud> References: <20260202-atlantis-clocks-v5-0-0922e43acaba@oss.tenstorrent.com> <20260202-atlantis-clocks-v5-1-0922e43acaba@oss.tenstorrent.com> <20260205-upbeat-tortoise-of-admiration-b3c0eb@quoll> <92512903-4651-4ac3-b3ea-c9297e866a3a@kernel.org> <20260207-stifle-chowtime-8502c0a57f70@spud> <6ebcb1a9-78ca-4734-8723-758f79e6819e@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SmoKN4vvk0qrDnrH" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: --SmoKN4vvk0qrDnrH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Feb 08, 2026 at 03:39:39PM -0600, Anirudh Srinivasan wrote: > On Sat, Feb 7, 2026 at 12:39=E2=80=AFPM Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > > On 07/02/2026 15:54, Conor Dooley wrote: > > >>>>> suggests picking a more generic name in this case, so isn't > > >>>>> "tenstorrent,atlantis-prcm" okay for that? > > >>>> > > >>>> No, because I don't want to keep guessing this. The docs clearly a= sk you > > >>>> to post complete bindings, which now became less-complete, but fin= e. > > > > > > I don't think it actually is "less complete" without the other > > > compatibles. The non-rcpu prcms function differently to the rcpu prcm > > > (they seem to be consumers of clocks that the rcpu produces) and are = not > > > supported by the drivers in this series. They're different devices an= d I > > > think should only be documented when support for them comes along. v4 > > > had problems that were caused by trying to document them without > > > actually having driver support figured out. > > > > It's fine without them, but then let's just name the file after that > > only sole compatible. >=20 > Okay, thank you for clarifying this. I will just add one compatible > and name the bindings file based on that one. >=20 > In the future when I add the remaining compatibles (and driver for > them), should I add them to this same bindings file? Can I rename the > file to have a more generic name then? Is renaming bindings files > okay? Or is this something to worry about for later? Nah, in the future it just keeps the name of one compatible. --SmoKN4vvk0qrDnrH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYKAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCaYotXAAKCRB4tDGHoIJi 0hUgAQDcQXJYtdev+whzngD+fgOFupT4Psq4f2Ns6wDCt7RGZwD9HtlTjdOfvZWj zrlmoCXKeFszKL3hYQQqsIJ0dDz7uwU= =4rH5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SmoKN4vvk0qrDnrH--