From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Abel Vesa" <abel.vesa@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 13/47] clk: qcom: gcc-qcs8300: Tie the CX power domain to controller
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2026 12:25:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260824122556.89E191F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260824-qcom-tie-cx-to-gcc-v3-13-f1205a92682b@oss.qualcomm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The GCC reset implementation does not take a pm_runtime reference before accessing reset registers, risking bus errors when consumers assert/deassert resets while the GCC controller is suspended.
--
--- Patch [13]: [PATCH v3 13/47] clk: qcom: gcc-qcs8300: Tie the CX power domain to controller ---
commit cad1ca2d5bc9c295249e6fa075b1dac72fab663e
Author: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@oss.qualcomm.com>
clk: qcom: gcc-qcs8300: Tie the CX power domain to controller
Enable runtime PM for the controller, allowing CX to be powered down
once all GCC consumers have released their clocks and GDSCs.
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-qcs8300.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-qcs8300.c
> index 146b3b5dfead3..d04980e4a0bba 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-qcs8300.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-qcs8300.c
> @@ -3681,6 +3681,7 @@ static const struct qcom_cc_desc gcc_qcs8300_desc = {
> .num_resets = ARRAY_SIZE(gcc_qcs8300_resets),
> .gdscs = gcc_qcs8300_gdscs,
> .num_gdscs = ARRAY_SIZE(gcc_qcs8300_gdscs),
> + .use_rpm = true,
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does enabling use_rpm expose a risk of bus
errors during reset assertions?
By setting use_rpm to true, the GCC controller and its CX power domain are
allowed to runtime suspend when all clocks and GDSCs are released. However,
the generic QCOM reset operations do not ensure the device is runtime-active
before performing register writes.
For example, when qcom_reset_set_assert() in drivers/clk/qcom/reset.c is
called, it performs:
regmap_update_bits(rst->regmap, map->reg, mask, assert ? mask : 0);
If a consumer asserts or deasserts a reset while the GCC controller is
suspended (such as from an error recovery interrupt, a teardown path, or by
a driver not utilizing PM runtime), could this register write fault and crash
the system?
Furthermore, because the reset operations use a fast_io regmap, they can be
invoked in an atomic context. If a consumer asserts a reset from an interrupt
handler while the GCC is suspended, it seems structurally impossible for the
consumer to wake the GCC controller first since doing so would sleep.
Is there a mechanism to prevent suspended register access during resets when
use_rpm is enabled?
> };
>
> static const struct of_device_id gcc_qcs8300_match_table[] = {
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260824-qcom-tie-cx-to-gcc-v3-0-f1205a92682b@oss.qualcomm.com?part=13
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-24 12:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-24 11:53 [PATCH v3 00/47] clk: qcom: Tie CX power domains to GCCs Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:53 ` [PATCH v3 01/47] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: gcc-sdm845: Add CX power domain Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 20:39 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-08-25 7:30 ` Abel Vesa
2026-08-25 7:34 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-08-25 8:01 ` Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:53 ` [PATCH v3 02/47] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: gcc-sm8150: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:53 ` [PATCH v3 03/47] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: gcc-sm8250: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:53 ` [PATCH v3 04/47] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: gcc-sm8350: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 12:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 11:53 ` [PATCH v3 05/47] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: gcc-sm8450: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 12:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 11:53 ` [PATCH v3 06/47] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: qcs615-gcc: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:53 ` [PATCH v3 07/47] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: sm8550-gcc: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 12:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 11:53 ` [PATCH v3 08/47] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: sm8650-gcc: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 12:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 11:53 ` [PATCH v3 09/47] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: sm8750-gcc: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:53 ` [PATCH v3 10/47] clk: qcom: gcc-eliza: Tie the CX power domain to controller Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:53 ` [PATCH v3 11/47] clk: qcom: gcc-kaanapali: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:53 ` [PATCH v3 12/47] clk: qcom: gcc-qcs615: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 12:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 13/47] clk: qcom: gcc-qcs8300: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 12:25 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 14/47] clk: qcom: gcc-qdu1000: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 12:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 15/47] clk: qcom: gcc-sa8775p: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 16/47] clk: qcom: gcc-sar2130p: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 12:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 17/47] clk: qcom: gcc-sc7180: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 12:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 18/47] clk: qcom: gcc-sc7280: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 12:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 19/47] clk: qcom: gcc-sdm670: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 12:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 20/47] clk: qcom: gcc-sdm845: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 12:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 21/47] clk: qcom: gcc-sdx75: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 22/47] clk: qcom: gcc-sm4450: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 23/47] clk: qcom: gcc-sm6350: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 12:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 24/47] clk: qcom: gcc-sm8150: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 12:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 25/47] clk: qcom: gcc-sm8250: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 26/47] clk: qcom: gcc-sm8350: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 12:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 27/47] clk: qcom: gcc-sm8450: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 28/47] clk: qcom: gcc-sm8550: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 29/47] clk: qcom: gcc-sm8650: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 30/47] clk: qcom: gcc-sm8750: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 31/47] clk: qcom: gcc-x1e80100: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 32/47] arm64: dts: qcom: kaanapali: Add GCC CX power domain Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 33/47] arm64: dts: qcom: monaco: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 12:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 34/47] arm64: dts: qcom: qdu1000: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 12:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 35/47] arm64: dts: qcom: sar2130p: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 36/47] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm670: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 37/47] arm64: dts: qcom: sdx75: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 12:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 38/47] arm64: dts: qcom: sm4450: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 39/47] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6350: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 12:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 40/47] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8150: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 41/47] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8250: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 42/47] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8350: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 43/47] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 44/47] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8550: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 45/47] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8650: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 46/47] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8750: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 47/47] arm64: dts: qcom: talos: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 16:28 ` [PATCH v3 00/47] clk: qcom: Tie CX power domains to GCCs Vinod Koul
2026-08-25 7:32 ` Abel Vesa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260824122556.89E191F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=abel.vesa@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox