From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Sarath Ganapathiraju" <sarath.ganapathiraju@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: conor+dt@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 2/2] clk: qcom: Add LPASS VA CSR heartbeat pulse clock
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2026 10:06:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260930100648.BC2B91F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260930-master-v10-2-105207bc5275@oss.qualcomm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] clk: qcom: missing hardware state restoration on runtime resume
- [Medium] clk: qcom: missing NULL check for of_device_get_match_data()
--
commit 506d9b3aab397203423c9181e755579f9ddb3dd7
Author: Sarath Ganapathiraju <sarath.ganapathiraju@oss.qualcomm.com>
clk: qcom: Add LPASS VA CSR heartbeat pulse clock
This commit adds the LPASS VA CSR driver to model the rate generator as a
clock provider. It attaches DT vote clocks to runtime PM and programs the
rate generator registers during probe.
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/lpass-va-csr.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/lpass-va-csr.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..b4c0f88187ebb
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/lpass-va-csr.c
[ ... ]
> +static int lpass_va_csr_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + const struct lpass_va_csr_data *data = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
[ ... ]
> + ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(dev);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = regmap_write(regmap, LPASS_RATE_GEN_COUNTER_0, data->counter_0);
[Severity: Medium]
Is there a risk of a NULL pointer dereference here?
If the device is bound manually via sysfs rather than instantiated through
Device Tree, of_device_get_match_data() will return NULL. The data pointer
is then unconditionally dereferenced when writing to LPASS_RATE_GEN_COUNTER_0
and LPASS_RATE_GEN_DELAY.
[Severity: High]
Does this hardware configuration get lost during runtime suspend and resume
cycles?
When the clock is unprepared by the consumer, the PM runtime reference is
dropped. The pm_clk_suspend callback disables the vote clocks, which can
allow the LPASS power domain to collapse and erase the register context.
The data written here to LPASS_RATE_GEN_COUNTER_0 and LPASS_RATE_GEN_DELAY
is only configured once during probe.
> + if (ret) {
> + pm_runtime_put_sync(dev);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = regmap_write(regmap, LPASS_RATE_GEN_DELAY, data->delay);
[ ... ]
> +static const struct dev_pm_ops lpass_va_csr_pm_ops = {
> + SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(pm_clk_suspend, pm_clk_resume, NULL)
> +};
[Severity: High]
Should there be a regcache_sync() call to restore the hardware state?
Because the generic pm_clk_resume is used directly without an additional
wrapper that syncs the regmap cache, the counter and delay registers are
not reprogrammed after waking up from runtime suspend. The subsequent
clk_enable_regmap() will only write the control register, leaving the
hardware with uninitialized or reset parameters which could break audio
DMAs and codec synchronization.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260930-master-v10-0-105207bc5275@oss.qualcomm.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-30 10:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-30 9:51 [PATCH v10 0/2] Add LPASS VA CSR HeartBeat pulse clock support Sarath Ganapathiraju via B4 Relay
2026-09-30 9:51 ` [PATCH v10 1/2] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: Add LPASS VA CSR HeartBeat pulse clock Sarath Ganapathiraju via B4 Relay
2026-09-30 9:51 ` [PATCH v10 2/2] clk: qcom: Add LPASS VA CSR heartbeat " Sarath Ganapathiraju via B4 Relay
2026-09-30 10:06 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-05 6:06 ` Ajay Kumar Nandam
2026-09-30 17:05 ` [PATCH v10 0/2] Add LPASS VA CSR HeartBeat pulse clock support Prasad Kumpatla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260930100648.BC2B91F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sarath.ganapathiraju@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox