From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail11.truemail.it (mail11.truemail.it [217.194.8.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 950BC3624DB; Wed, 30 Sep 2026 11:49:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.194.8.81 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790768971; cv=none; b=m2FeyXiKvSr+PJRF2rtZw1FhcOpQeCh6rJkTMFk9CVXxJXQThyiByVvhmFmQGAVaW0dAYB+36jdKOgurDfd4FZfeYfGxoNja8Q5gqzAyGPH4ZZwKcivTurJWuO71yf9YZYSA5Tr/aahE/F9ufYuob49dCe39Wvo6tr1Vax3g2ow= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790768971; c=relaxed/simple; bh=fH9KqpUd/UAig1ou+hpknXGpJweBouk38gVkdK7C9cQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=f4KVVUbiBxUD4E4ojlthsGrnm/p3auBjSJXjngp/tDjSm5fYkgXN/sQtvUhsWOidSmqY+ayr7+Yr0b2mS268RW6or/OJ++o5OthnK9aLEjdzWXMt1H2FWEJyhPReoV4p7RxCklafDy11nvdsPMRZ++IiDzMnyleW7taS6d89YEk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=dolcini.it; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dolcini.it; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dolcini.it header.i=@dolcini.it header.b=pfUogwvG; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.194.8.81 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=dolcini.it Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dolcini.it Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dolcini.it header.i=@dolcini.it header.b="pfUogwvG" Received: from francesco-nb.. (93-49-2-63.ip317.fastwebnet.it [93.49.2.63]) by mail11.truemail.it (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0D7631FB1B; Wed, 30 Sep 2026 13:49:18 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dolcini.it; s=default; t=1790768958; bh=HIwm+dEiYRCTnCPcd9kDSKgwpQhnVykGcKTzar+9zo8=; h=From:To:Subject; b=pfUogwvG1OVQTPVBu9qmufBiDZBvI8pBOyFvIk7bOy7ikZsuqZOd26w48pUu/gWDf RlFZur/VTXqmaoeL1TDQvNPZPSlVnVcDDRbbrxO56p4M7jL47Vgjmek9VJ19x95uku nwn4DT7t5wCAZTok3X3ndPdxQZH/sJ3LO+NT5+IbirSxxv09SSbWNRIYrxqz0XBt4B 6cjXcRGYwFr1bK5RDc3Pu2LHp11V/tjrjjaVacSm4KTH/Bpk1dZQ3iT84VZCgRqjgU xabIyGoSty6L/N2T6JBGJZKaAevtKwpRJzJGw8pykTdfY3KJmijd9OGv4jQVvX/ZNu C3Oa/Xn1W+X0g== From: Francesco Dolcini To: Stephen Boyd , Brian Masney , Jerome Brunet Cc: Francesco Dolcini , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Heiko Stuebner Subject: [PATCH] clk: clk-gpio: do not blame the DT property on probe deferral Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2026 13:49:06 +0200 Message-ID: <20260930114907.153690-1-francesco@dolcini.it> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: Francesco Dolcini The message is also stored as the probe deferral reason, where it wrongly claims the 'enable'/'select' property is missing while it is the GPIO provider that has not probed (yet?). Signed-off-by: Francesco Dolcini --- drivers/clk/clk-gpio.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-gpio.c b/drivers/clk/clk-gpio.c index 9099c57e2715..918b2c6444ee 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/clk-gpio.c +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-gpio.c @@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ static int gpio_clk_driver_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) gpiod = devm_gpiod_get(dev, gpio_name, GPIOD_OUT_LOW); if (IS_ERR(gpiod)) return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(gpiod), - "Can't get '%s' named GPIO property\n", gpio_name); + "Can't get '%s' GPIO\n", gpio_name); if (is_mux) hw = clk_hw_register_gpio_mux(dev, gpiod); -- 2.47.3