Linux clock framework development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Henrik Grimler <henrik@grimler.se>
To: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
	Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>,
	Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>,
	Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@linaro.org>,
	Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	Brian Masney <bmasney+clk@redhat.com>,
	Jerome Brunet <jbrunet+clk@baylibre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: samsung: exynos5-subcmu: Defer probe until power domains are available
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2026 13:21:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261016112140.GA17404@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261013111840.3645724-1-m.szyprowski@samsung.com>

Hi Marek,

On Tue, Oct 13, 2026 at 01:18:38PM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Sub-CMU devices are added to their power domains with
> of_genpd_add_device() during exynos5_clk_probe(). Its return value is
> ignored, so if the power domain provider is not registered yet, the
> sub-CMU device is silently left outside of its power domain.
> 
> Since commit c09a3e6c97f0 ("soc: samsung: pm_domains: Convert to regular
> platform driver"), power domain providers are registered only when their
> platform devices are probed, which happens after exynos5_clk_probe() has
> already been called.
> 
> When a sub-CMU device is outside of its power domain, its runtime PM
> callbacks race with the power domain state changes, which might result in
> losing the proper hardware state. In practice, some clock muxes are left
> switched to the oscillator instead of the respective PLLs.
> 
> Fix this by deferring exynos5_clk_probe() until the platform devices for
> all available power domains are instantiated.
> 
> Fixes: c09a3e6c97f0 ("soc: samsung: pm_domains: Convert to regular platform driver")
> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>

Reviewed-by: Henrik Grimler <henrik@grimler.se>

I have noticed the same issue on my boards, and the fix looks good to
me. Thanks for fixing it!

Best regards,
Henrik Grimler

> ---
>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5-subcmu.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5-subcmu.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5-subcmu.c
> index 373129847301..587fe6e3bbed 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5-subcmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5-subcmu.c
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
>  
>  #include <linux/io.h>
>  #include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>  #include <linux/pm_domain.h>
>  #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> @@ -155,11 +156,25 @@ static int __init exynos5_clk_register_subcmu(struct device *parent,
>  
>  static int __init exynos5_clk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
> +	static const char pd_node_name[] = "samsung,exynos4210-pd";
>  	struct device_node *np;
>  	const char *name;
>  	int i;
>  
> -	for_each_compatible_node(np, NULL, "samsung,exynos4210-pd") {
> +	/* Defer until all needed power domains are registered */
> +	for_each_compatible_node(np, NULL, pd_node_name) {
> +		if (of_device_is_available(np)) {
> +			struct platform_device *pd = of_find_device_by_node(np);
> +
> +			if (!pd) {
> +				of_node_put(np);
> +				return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> +			}
> +			put_device(&pd->dev);
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	for_each_compatible_node(np, NULL, pd_node_name) {
>  		if (of_property_read_string(np, "label", &name) < 0)
>  			continue;
>  		for (i = 0; i < nr_cmus; i++)
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 
> 

      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-10-16 11:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20261013111847eucas1p24df37631cc74fa27879f7d979348a1e1@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2026-10-13 11:18 ` [PATCH] clk: samsung: exynos5-subcmu: Defer probe until power domains are available Marek Szyprowski
2026-10-13 11:35   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16 11:21   ` Henrik Grimler [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261016112140.GA17404@localhost \
    --to=henrik@grimler.se \
    --cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
    --cc=bmasney+clk@redhat.com \
    --cc=cw00.choi@samsung.com \
    --cc=jbrunet+clk@baylibre.com \
    --cc=krzk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=peter.griffin@linaro.org \
    --cc=s.nawrocki@samsung.com \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox