From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz To: Viresh Kumar Cc: Thomas Abraham , Sylwester Nawrocki , Michael Turquette , Kukjin Kim , Kukjin Kim , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Tomasz Figa , Lukasz Majewski , Heiko Stuebner , Chanwoo Choi , Kevin Hilman , Javier Martinez Canillas , Tobias Jakobi , Anand Moon , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] cpufreq: opp: fix handling of turbo modes Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 13:47:41 +0200 Message-id: <2681271.3UazeZ9PAQ@amdc1976> In-reply-to: <20150727113641.GB10181@linux> References: <1436456621-29839-1-git-send-email-b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> <3141301.RS9TLygaba@amdc1976> <20150727113641.GB10181@linux> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Monday, July 27, 2015 05:06:41 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 27-07-15, 13:14, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > Sorry but you don't seem to understand the issue. > > :) > > No, I did. I understand that if someone uses opp bindings today with > some entries as turbo OPPs, cpufreq will use them as normal > frequencies. And that may harm the board. > > BUT, opp-v2 code isn't ready to be used yet. And platforms should see > what all is implemented before trying to use them. OK. > All I was saying is, this isn't a FIX as we haven't introduced the > feature yet. Otherwise I had no issues with the patch. I will update the description for the next patchset revision. Best regards, -- Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Samsung R&D Institute Poland Samsung Electronics