From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtpout-04.galae.net (smtpout-04.galae.net [185.171.202.116]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17E113D16EA; Wed, 25 Mar 2026 12:50:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.171.202.116 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774443063; cv=none; b=EADJy2lAajlFQBaeeZVHiRc8S+T1ptM4XVrbC3DdOuvQYemejH6egGBNad2ifuDbYu7lr6/vrl97RqPrZIQg7pb+PBDBT3kX6tPKBjceunmGo7JRz+yowRIg5/tD6uKYZbSGHiKu7ybBQh4vZHaC4O5Onyd5IoOIAhL+dl6WU8k= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774443063; c=relaxed/simple; bh=nis1EnGXaiGBbbe98OlND9BRNrjSeGkjUvM8qCuEYHY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=tKZRuWdaVbE3I2oD7747FC2jbul5X7DHdDFZQvjaJ0CPi2ckrMBd7OU54WosfPnKTN3sYH0pDTjtLAwALl/n4Iki598pmhY9OV8xbpNWWXwvuTNncU2udq7fFL5RF2tYDiu3UETShISuMqeHoW3K93XH+gDkgB+bAFg64oGQ+Ic= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b=NB90DRRC; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.171.202.116 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b="NB90DRRC" Received: from smtpout-01.galae.net (smtpout-01.galae.net [212.83.139.233]) by smtpout-04.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDD86C5809F; Wed, 25 Mar 2026 12:51:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.galae.net (mail.galae.net [212.83.136.155]) by smtpout-01.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20907601E2; Wed, 25 Mar 2026 12:50:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id 6CA161045140B; Wed, 25 Mar 2026 13:50:54 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=dkim; t=1774443057; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references; bh=6UOrP8NS5n8uHLOxDqtPTPLp/+9HsWqNfo5o09hCrZw=; b=NB90DRRCC8NNSr3AhF4AKuaEqfIN25HFhKvj0nX6/r81xjjvuXWcSg2EwnRgUg+Kbl9FZc KTlOzikvFl2LZjCaVHAPuL1Q2WXHa8Hs/COKKlr7SVuBwbvROtwXCSAfRkNOmrDXRg0Lod F4ZRHWFXKH9U7QIQ3Z0v0pSBWFYkW0gVi9PlzastXPQxWYUCoYSm9nPF3K9QND4qeaExTj byp3jpI7goDteGRV+gmSl3rhpalQipX8fV93e2UOVPm5YhlfS0nZWHXANSddvJUCHN0qGJ wTX2GGR9Oi1mVRN4WQQaOX3W6+CzASBaLUDo4lH7rlJsUtoFeVlLwMGrT7WIXA== From: =?UTF-8?B?QmVub8OudA==?= Monin To: Linus Walleij , Thomas Bogendoerfer Cc: Vladimir Kondratiev , Gregory CLEMENT , =?UTF-8?B?VGjDqW8=?= Lebrun , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Philipp Zabel , Thomas Petazzoni , Tawfik Bayouk , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/13] pinctrl: eyeq5: Add Mobileye EyeQ6Lplus OLB Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2026 13:50:53 +0100 Message-ID: <27303918.1r3eYUQgxm@benoit.monin> In-Reply-To: References: <20260316-eyeq6lplus-v4-0-bf44dfc7a261@bootlin.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.3 On Tuesday, 24 March 2026 at 15:04:03 CET, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote: > On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 10:05:12AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 4:26=E2=80=AFPM Beno=C3=AEt Monin wrote: > >=20 > > > Add the match data for the pinctrl found in the EyeQ6Lplus OLB. The p= in > > > control is identical in function to the one present in the EyeQ5 but > > > has a single bank of 32 pins. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Beno=C3=AEt Monin > >=20 > > Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij > >=20 > > I don't know your merge strategy for this patch series, if you want part > > of it applied to the pinctrl tree then tell me which patches and how. >=20 > as there are also MIPS parts involved and Stephen Acked the clk Patches > it might be best to merge via MIPS tree >=20 > Thomas. >=20 >=20 I proposed to Stephen to take the patches related to the OLB (clk, pinctrl and reset) in the clk tree[1]. The following patches could go through the mips tree: [PATCH v4 01/13] dt-bindings: mips: Add Mobileye EyeQ6Lplus SoC [PATCH v4 02/13] dt-bindings: soc: mobileye: Add EyeQ6Lplus OLB [PATCH v4 03/13] MIPS: Add Mobileye EyeQ6Lplus support [PATCH v4 10/13] MIPS: Add Mobileye EyeQ6Lplus SoC dtsi [PATCH v4 11/13] MIPS: Add Mobileye EyeQ6Lplus evaluation board dts [PATCH v4 12/13] MIPS: config: add eyeq6lplus_defconfig [PATCH v4 13/13] MAINTAINERS: Mobileye: Add EyeQ6Lplus files =46or the two sets of patches to build properly, the OLB dt-bindings patch (patch 02/13) is present in both as the clk-eyeq driver and the SoC device tree use the header introduced in it. I don't know if having a patch in two trees is a valid merge strategy. Any opinion on that? [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/2786053.vuYhMxLoTh@benoit.monin/ Best regards, =2D-=20 Beno=C3=AEt Monin, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com