From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <arnd@arndb.de>
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Roman Volkov <v1ron@mail.ru>
Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>, Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>, Roman Volkov <rvolkov@v1ros.org>, Tony Prisk <linux@prisktech.co.nz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] clk/vt8500: Fix compilation warnings
Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 22:15:38 +0200
Message-ID: <30846983.uaNfNPJlta@wuerfel>
In-Reply-To: <20160531213854.343e6129@v1ron-s7>
References: <1464120473-1808-1-git-send-email-v1ron@mail.ru> <4814911.mY88HjlURn@wuerfel> <20160531213854.343e6129@v1ron-s7>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
List-ID: <linux-clk.vger.kernel.org>

On Tuesday, May 31, 2016 9:38:54 PM CEST Roman Volkov wrote:
> 
> Arnd, your version is fine for me. We may apply it instead.
> 
> As you can see, I attached another patch where the logic for WM8650 is
> completely reworked. This patch also removes the warning, that is why
> fixing the wm8650 function is not necessary.
> 
> What about the WM8650 enhancement? Can I apply it on top of your
> changes?

I think the easiest way is if you pick up my patch and submit it together
with your other patch as a series (keeping my From: line and adding your
Signed-off-by: below mine).

My patch should probably go first so we can get it into linux-4.7, while
I assume your other one is for 4.8? If we want both in 4.7, either order
is fine.

	Arnd