From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Heiko Stuebner To: Uwe =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kleine=2DK=F6nig?= Cc: Mike Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Sylwester Nawrocki , Tomasz Figa , Michal Simek , kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: make several parent names const Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 12:35:12 +0200 Message-ID: <4095482.AGzSOmiiYQ@phil> In-Reply-To: <1432802751-6397-1-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> References: <1432802751-6397-1-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" List-ID: Am Donnerstag, 28. Mai 2015, 10:45:51 schrieb Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig: > Since commit 2893c379461a ("clk: make strings in parent name arrays > const") the name of parent clocks can be const. So add more const in > several clock drivers. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner > --- > Hello, >=20 > commit 2893c379461a isn't in Linus Torvald's tree yet, so the commit > message needs adaption if clk-next is rewritten. >=20 > Should I split this patch per subdir? I don't have any Rockchip-related clock changes for 4.2, so for me it's= not=20 important if you split it or keep it together. Thanks Heiko