From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <555CC357.5090105@nvidia.com> Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 13:24:39 -0400 From: Rhyland Klein MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Benson Leung CC: Peter De Schrijver , Mike Turquette , Stephen Warren , Stephen Boyd , Thierry Reding , Alexandre Courbot , Bill Huang , Paul Walmsley , Jim Lin , , , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 12/21] clk: tegra: pll: Add specialized logic for T210 References: <1431451444-23155-1-git-send-email-rklein@nvidia.com> <1431451444-23155-14-git-send-email-rklein@nvidia.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Return-Path: rklein@nvidia.com List-ID: On 5/13/2015 4:59 PM, Benson Leung wrote: > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Rhyland Klein wrote: >> On Tegra210 SoC's, the logic to enable several of the plls is different >> from previous generations. Therefore, add registeration functions specific > > s/registeration/registration > >> to Tegra210 which will handle them appropriately. >> >> Signed-off-by: Rhyland Klein >> --- >> v5: >> - Removed unused variables. >> >> v4: >> - Fixed plle_tegra210_is_enabled callback typos >> >> v2: >> - Fixed plle logic. PLLE on Tegra210 has had its enable bit moved, so >> we can't use the default _clk_pll_enable/disable routines. Instead, >> manually set/clear the correct bit for PLLE within its functions. >> >> drivers/clk/tegra/clk-pll.c | 347 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- >> drivers/clk/tegra/clk.h | 24 +++ >> 2 files changed, 369 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-pll.c b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-pll.c >> index 54ebab2b85e5..2b1f672e3bdb 100644 >> --- a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-pll.c >> +++ b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-pll.c >> @@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ >> #define PLLE_BASE_DIVN_WIDTH 8 >> #define PLLE_BASE_DIVM_SHIFT 0 >> #define PLLE_BASE_DIVM_WIDTH 8 >> +#define PLLE_BASE_ENABLE BIT(31) >> >> #define PLLE_MISC_SETUP_BASE_SHIFT 16 >> #define PLLE_MISC_SETUP_BASE_MASK (0xffff << PLLE_MISC_SETUP_BASE_SHIFT) >> @@ -910,7 +911,8 @@ const struct clk_ops tegra_clk_plle_ops = { >> >> #if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_114_SOC) || \ >> defined(CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_124_SOC) || \ >> - defined(CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_132_SOC) >> + defined(CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_132_SOC) || \ >> + defined(CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_210_SOC) >> >> static int _pll_fixed_mdiv(struct tegra_clk_pll_params *pll_params, >> unsigned long parent_rate) >> @@ -1579,7 +1581,8 @@ struct clk *tegra_clk_register_plle(const char *name, const char *parent_name, >> >> #if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_114_SOC) || \ >> defined(CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_124_SOC) || \ >> - defined(CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_132_SOC) >> + defined(CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_132_SOC) || \ >> + defined(CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_210_SOC) >> static const struct clk_ops tegra_clk_pllxc_ops = { >> .is_enabled = clk_pll_is_enabled, >> .enable = clk_pll_enable, > > > It looks like you might have missed changing one set of #if defined > further down below to include CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_210_SOC : > > #if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_124_SOC) || defined(CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_132_SOC) ... > struct clk *tegra_clk_register_pllss(const char *name, const char *parent_name, ... > #endif > No, this was intentional. tegra_clk_register_pllss isn't used on Tegra210, it adds its own version "register_clk_register_pllss_tegra210" which it uses and it doesn't need the tegra_clk_pllss_ops either. So it should be fine without this. -rhyland -- nvpublic