From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com
Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: clk: change clk_ops' ->determine_rate() prototype
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 15:41:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55A43E8B.8020104@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150710082612.GC29999@mwanda>
On 07/10/2015 01:26 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Hello Boris Brezillon,
>
> This is a semi-automatic email about new static checker warnings.
>
> The patch 4a7c639697ef: "clk: change clk_ops' ->determine_rate()
> prototype" from Jul 7, 2015, leads to the following Smatch complaint:
>
> drivers/clk/clk.c:458 clk_mux_determine_rate_flags()
> error: we previously assumed 'parent' could be null (see line 452)
>
> drivers/clk/clk.c
> 451 if (core->flags & CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT) {
> 452 ret = __clk_determine_rate(parent ? parent->hw : NULL,
> ^^^^^^
> Check for NULL.
>
> 453 &parent_req);
> 454 if (ret)
> 455 return ret;
> 456
> 457 best = parent_req.rate;
> 458 req->best_parent_hw = parent->hw;
> ^^^^^^^^^^
> Patch adds unchecked dereference.
>
> 459 req->best_parent_rate = best;
> 460 } else if (parent) {
>
>
Thanks Dan.
Boris,
It looks like the transformation here isn't equivalent. If parent is
NULL here and we don't crash, parent_req->rate == req->rate and before
this patch req->rate would be 0 instead. How about this patch squashed
in? It includes some of the removals of best_parent_* assignments that
you had in your follow-up patch, because those make it equivalent to the
previous code.
------8<----
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
index c182d8a7924e..244a6535c69c 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
@@ -455,16 +455,10 @@ clk_mux_determine_rate_flags(struct clk_hw *hw, struct clk_rate_request *req,
return ret;
best = parent_req.rate;
- req->best_parent_hw = parent->hw;
- req->best_parent_rate = best;
} else if (parent) {
best = clk_core_get_rate_nolock(parent);
- req->best_parent_hw = parent->hw;
- req->best_parent_rate = best;
} else {
best = clk_core_get_rate_nolock(core);
- req->best_parent_hw = NULL;
- req->best_parent_rate = 0;
}
goto out;
@@ -810,8 +804,10 @@ static int clk_core_round_rate_nolock(struct clk_core *core,
*/
int __clk_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, struct clk_rate_request *req)
{
- if (!hw)
+ if (!hw) {
+ req->rate = 0;
return 0;
+ }
return clk_core_round_rate_nolock(hw->core, req);
}
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-13 22:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-10 8:26 clk: change clk_ops' ->determine_rate() prototype Dan Carpenter
2015-07-13 22:41 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2015-07-14 10:45 ` Boris Brezillon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55A43E8B.8020104@codeaurora.org \
--to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox