From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <prvs=71030a23e=julien.grall@citrix.com>
Message-ID: <560E6768.6040705@citrix.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 12:15:52 +0100
From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@citrix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
CC: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>, Mark Rutland
	<mark.rutland@arm.com>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, Pawel Moll
	<pawel.moll@arm.com>, =?windows-1252?Q?Emilio_L=F3pez?=
	<emilio@elopez.com.ar>, Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	"Stephen Boyd" <sboyd@codeaurora.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	KumarGala <galak@codeaurora.org>, <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org"
	<freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: "clk: sunxi: Add a simple gates driver" breaks kernel with older
 DTB
References: <1443689231.16718.225.camel@citrix.com>
 <20151001204506.GR7104@lukather> <560E5767.2040502@citrix.com>
 <20151002105333.GA2696@lukather>
In-Reply-To: <20151002105333.GA2696@lukather>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Return-Path: julien.grall@citrix.com
List-ID: <linux-clk.vger.kernel.org>

On 02/10/15 11:53, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>> If no, that's very unfortunate because it means that you can't
>> re-use the same DT across multiple OS and the DT provided by the
>> firmware (if it's built-in).
> 
> Is there such OS yet (and by that, I mean one that actually shares our
> DT, instead of rewriting its own) ?

Yes, FreeBSD started to support the DT provided by vendors which are
based on Linux bindings. The ARM64 port is only using DTB provided by
the hardware. For ARM32, there is still some platform using a specific
DT for FreeBSD but they are trying to get a ride.

Regards,

-- 
Julien Grall