From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
To: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Cc: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@de.bosch.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xen/arm: register clocks used by the hypervisor
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 15:08:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <577BBF69.8010809@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1607051456410.2575@sstabellini-ThinkPad-X260>
On 05/07/16 15:04, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Jul 2016, Julien Grall wrote:
>> On 05/07/16 14:53, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>> On Thu, 30 Jun 2016, Dirk Behme wrote:
>>>> +- clocks: one or more clocks to be registered.
>>>> + Xen hypervisor drivers might replace native drivers, resulting in
>>>> + clocks not registered by these native drivers. To avoid that these
>>>> + unregistered clocks are disabled, then, e.g. by clk_disable_unused(),
>>>> + register them in the hypervisor node.
>>>> + An example for this are the clocks of the serial driver. If the clocks
>>>> + used by the serial hardware interface are not registered by the serial
>>>> + driver the serial output might stop once clk_disable_unused() is
>>>> called.
>>>
>>> What if we use the "status" property of the clocks? Could we set it to
>>> "disabled" in Xen? Would that be enough for Linux to leave them alone?
>>
>> clocks could be shared between multiple devices. So it is not possible to
>> disable the clock.
>
> To clarify my suggestion: I am not saying we should disable the clock, I
> am saying we should set the "status" property to "disabled" in Xen for
> the clock used by the serial or passthrough devices (for which the
> "status" property is already set to "disabled"). That should work for
> cases where the clock is not shared among multiple devices.
How would you be able to differentiate in Xen between a clock shared and
a non-shared one? The only way I can think it going through all the
device tree which sounds really expensive.
> If the clock is shared, then I don't think we would run into the issue
> described by Dirk because I wouldn't imagine clk_disable_unused would
> try to disable the clock anymore, because it would actually be in use
> from Linux POV.
We also want to prevent Linux changing the rate of the clock (see Mark's
mail [1]).
Regards,
[1]
https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-07/msg00335.html
--
Julien Grall
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-05 14:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-30 10:32 [PATCH v2] xen/arm: register clocks used by the hypervisor Dirk Behme
2016-06-30 14:21 ` Mark Rutland
2016-06-30 14:56 ` [Xen-devel] " Dirk Behme
2016-06-30 15:18 ` Mark Rutland
2016-06-30 15:33 ` Julien Grall
2016-07-05 13:53 ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-07-05 13:54 ` Julien Grall
2016-07-05 14:02 ` Julien Grall
2016-07-05 14:04 ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-07-05 14:08 ` Julien Grall [this message]
2016-07-05 14:37 ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-07-06 1:34 ` Michael Turquette
2016-07-06 13:10 ` Julien Grall
2016-07-06 13:16 ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-07-06 13:26 ` Julien Grall
2016-07-06 13:48 ` Mark Rutland
2016-07-06 20:42 ` Michael Turquette
2016-07-07 7:32 ` Dirk Behme
2016-07-08 2:50 ` Michael Turquette
2016-07-08 5:51 ` [Xen-devel] " Dirk Behme
2016-07-08 9:21 ` Julien Grall
2016-07-08 6:48 ` Dirk Behme
2016-07-08 9:35 ` Julien Grall
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-07-05 6:50 Dirk Behme
2016-07-05 10:39 ` Mark Rutland
2016-07-05 10:45 ` Dirk Behme
2016-07-05 11:07 ` Mark Rutland
2016-07-06 23:38 ` Michael Turquette
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=577BBF69.8010809@arm.com \
--to=julien.grall@arm.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dirk.behme@de.bosch.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).