From: Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@rock-chips.com>
To: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Cc: mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@codeaurora.org,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, huangtao@rock-chips.com,
cl@rock-chips.com, xxx@rock-chips.com, xf@rock-chips.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] clk: fractional-divider: allow overriding of approximation
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2017 11:43:34 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <59814A66.5070500@rock-chips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5453089.AIzWDZk3ey@phil>
hi,heiko:
This a good solution.And I tested it on RK SOCs.It's work well.
On 08/02/2017 12:21 AM, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> From: Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@rock-chips.com>
>
> Fractional dividers may have special requirements concerning numerator
> and denominator selection that differ from just getting the best
> approximation.
>
> For example on Rockchip socs the denominator must be at least 20 times
> larger than the numerator to generate precise clock frequencies.
>
> Therefore add the ability to provide custom approximation functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@rock-chips.com>
> ---
> drivers/clk/clk-fractional-divider.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++--------
> include/linux/clk-provider.h | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-fractional-divider.c b/drivers/clk/clk-fractional-divider.c
> index aab904618eb6..fdf625fb10fa 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-fractional-divider.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-fractional-divider.c
> @@ -49,16 +49,12 @@ static unsigned long clk_fd_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static long clk_fd_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> - unsigned long *parent_rate)
> +static void clk_fd_general_approximation(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> + unsigned long *parent_rate,
> + unsigned long *m, unsigned long *n)
> {
> struct clk_fractional_divider *fd = to_clk_fd(hw);
> unsigned long scale;
> - unsigned long m, n;
> - u64 ret;
> -
> - if (!rate || rate >= *parent_rate)
> - return *parent_rate;
>
> /*
> * Get rate closer to *parent_rate to guarantee there is no overflow
> @@ -71,7 +67,23 @@ static long clk_fd_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
>
> rational_best_approximation(rate, *parent_rate,
> GENMASK(fd->mwidth - 1, 0), GENMASK(fd->nwidth - 1, 0),
> - &m, &n);
> + m, n);
> +}
> +
> +static long clk_fd_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> + unsigned long *parent_rate)
> +{
> + struct clk_fractional_divider *fd = to_clk_fd(hw);
> + unsigned long m, n;
> + u64 ret;
> +
> + if (!rate || rate >= *parent_rate)
> + return *parent_rate;
> +
> + if (fd->approximation)
> + fd->approximation(hw, rate, parent_rate, &m, &n);
> + else
> + clk_fd_general_approximation(hw, rate, parent_rate, &m, &n);
>
> ret = (u64)*parent_rate * m;
> do_div(ret, n);
> diff --git a/include/linux/clk-provider.h b/include/linux/clk-provider.h
> index c59c62571e4f..1fc113fbf955 100644
> --- a/include/linux/clk-provider.h
> +++ b/include/linux/clk-provider.h
> @@ -565,6 +565,9 @@ struct clk_fractional_divider {
> u8 nwidth;
> u32 nmask;
> u8 flags;
> + void (*approximation)(struct clk_hw *hw,
> + unsigned long rate, unsigned long *parent_rate,
> + unsigned long *m, unsigned long *n);
> spinlock_t *lock;
> };
>
>
Tested-by: Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@rock-chips.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-02 3:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-21 8:03 [PATCH v3] clk: fractional-divider: fix up the fractional clk's jitter Elaine Zhang
2017-08-01 16:19 ` Heiko Stuebner
2017-08-01 16:21 ` [PATCH 1/2] clk: fractional-divider: allow overriding of approximation Heiko Stuebner
2017-08-02 3:43 ` Elaine Zhang [this message]
2017-08-07 23:02 ` Stephen Boyd
2017-08-08 15:58 ` Heiko Stuebner
2017-08-01 16:22 ` [PATCH 2/2] clk: rockchip: add special approximation to fix up fractional clk's jitter Heiko Stuebner
2017-08-02 3:43 ` Elaine Zhang
2017-08-08 15:58 ` Heiko Stuebner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=59814A66.5070500@rock-chips.com \
--to=zhangqing@rock-chips.com \
--cc=cl@rock-chips.com \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=huangtao@rock-chips.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=xf@rock-chips.com \
--cc=xxx@rock-chips.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).