From: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
To: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
"moderated list:SAMSUNG SOC CLOCK DRIVERS"
<linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:COMMON CLK FRAMEWORK" <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] clk: samsung: s3c2410: fix PLL rates
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 16:10:37 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5A8BC9ED.7010303@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180216145754.14428-7-a.hajda@samsung.com>
On 2018년 02월 16일 23:57, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> Rates declared in PLL rate tables should match exactly rates calculated
> from PLL coefficients. If that is not the case, rate of parent might be being
> set not as expected. For instance, if in the PLL rates table we have
> a 393216000 Hz entry and the real value as returned by the PLL's recalc_rate
> callback is 393216003, after setting PLL's clk rate to 393216000 clk_get_rate
> will return 393216003. If we now attempt to set rate of a PLL's child divider
> clock to 393216000/2 its rate will be 131072001, rather than 196608000.
> That is the divider will be set to 3 instead of 2, because 393216003/2 is
> greater than 196608000.
>
> To fix this issue declared rates are changed to exactly match rates generated
> by a PLL, as calculated from the P, M, S, K coefficients.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
> Acked-by: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-s3c2410.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-s3c2410.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-s3c2410.c
> index e0650c33863b..d8e58a659467 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-s3c2410.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-s3c2410.c
> @@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ static struct samsung_pll_rate_table pll_s3c2410_12mhz_tbl[] __initdata = {
> PLL_35XX_RATE(226000000, 105, 1, 1),
> PLL_35XX_RATE(210000000, 132, 2, 1),
> /* 2410 common */
> - PLL_35XX_RATE(203000000, 161, 3, 1),
> + PLL_35XX_RATE(202800000, 161, 3, 1),
> PLL_35XX_RATE(192000000, 88, 1, 1),
> PLL_35XX_RATE(186000000, 85, 1, 1),
> PLL_35XX_RATE(180000000, 82, 1, 1),
> @@ -178,18 +178,18 @@ static struct samsung_pll_rate_table pll_s3c2410_12mhz_tbl[] __initdata = {
> PLL_35XX_RATE(147000000, 90, 2, 1),
> PLL_35XX_RATE(135000000, 82, 2, 1),
> PLL_35XX_RATE(124000000, 116, 1, 2),
> - PLL_35XX_RATE(118000000, 150, 2, 2),
> + PLL_35XX_RATE(118500000, 150, 2, 2),
> PLL_35XX_RATE(113000000, 105, 1, 2),
> - PLL_35XX_RATE(101000000, 127, 2, 2),
> + PLL_35XX_RATE(101250000, 127, 2, 2),
> PLL_35XX_RATE(90000000, 112, 2, 2),
> - PLL_35XX_RATE(85000000, 105, 2, 2),
> + PLL_35XX_RATE(84750000, 105, 2, 2),
> PLL_35XX_RATE(79000000, 71, 1, 2),
> - PLL_35XX_RATE(68000000, 82, 2, 2),
> - PLL_35XX_RATE(56000000, 142, 2, 3),
> + PLL_35XX_RATE(67500000, 82, 2, 2),
> + PLL_35XX_RATE(56250000, 142, 2, 3),
> PLL_35XX_RATE(48000000, 120, 2, 3),
> - PLL_35XX_RATE(51000000, 161, 3, 3),
> + PLL_35XX_RATE(50700000, 161, 3, 3),
> PLL_35XX_RATE(45000000, 82, 1, 3),
> - PLL_35XX_RATE(34000000, 82, 2, 3),
> + PLL_35XX_RATE(33750000, 82, 2, 3),
> { /* sentinel */ },
> };
>
>
Looks good to me.
Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
--
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-20 7:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20180216145803eucas1p2b75e6f26d2979ee129152f674a31e886@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2018-02-16 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] clk: samsung: fix PLL rates Andrzej Hajda
2018-02-16 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] clk: samsung: exynos3250: " Andrzej Hajda
2018-02-16 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] clk: samsung: exynos5250: " Andrzej Hajda
2018-02-16 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] clk: samsung: exynos5260: " Andrzej Hajda
2018-02-19 6:27 ` Chanwoo Choi
2018-02-16 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] clk: samsung: exynos5433: " Andrzej Hajda
2018-02-19 6:27 ` Chanwoo Choi
2018-02-16 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] clk: samsung: exynos7: " Andrzej Hajda
2018-02-19 6:28 ` Chanwoo Choi
2018-02-16 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] clk: samsung: s3c2410: " Andrzej Hajda
2018-02-20 7:10 ` Chanwoo Choi [this message]
2018-02-16 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] clk: samsung: add compile time PLL rate validators Andrzej Hajda
2018-02-19 9:44 ` Chanwoo Choi
2018-02-19 10:07 ` Andrzej Hajda
2018-02-20 7:05 ` [PATCH v3 " Andrzej Hajda
2018-02-20 7:10 ` Chanwoo Choi
2018-03-06 16:46 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] clk: samsung: fix PLL rates Sylwester Nawrocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5A8BC9ED.7010303@samsung.com \
--to=cw00.choi@samsung.com \
--cc=a.hajda@samsung.com \
--cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
--cc=kgene@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=s.nawrocki@samsung.com \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox