From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-id: <5AE12E4A.90907@samsung.com> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 10:41:30 +0900 From: Chanwoo Choi To: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Kukjin Kim , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Tejun Heo , Sylwester Nawrocki , Tomasz Figa , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Viresh Kumar , Zhang Rui , Eduardo Valentin , Russell King , Hans de Goede , Linus Walleij , Andi Shyti , Mark Brown , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Alan Stern , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org Cc: Marek Szyprowski , Arnd Bergmann , Olof Johansson , Jaehoon Chung Subject: Re: [RFC 06/10] thermal: samsung: Remove support for Exynos5440 In-reply-to: <20180424203239.21885-7-krzk@kernel.org> References: <20180424203239.21885-1-krzk@kernel.org> <20180424203239.21885-7-krzk@kernel.org> List-ID: Hi Krzysztof, On 2018년 04월 25일 05:32, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > The Exynos5440 is not actively developed, there are no development > boards available and probably there are no real products with it. > Remove wide-tree support for Exynos5440. > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt | 14 +- > drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c | 155 +-------------------- > drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.h | 1 - > 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 166 deletions(-) After applied this patch, I tested the build and found out 'exynos5440' keyword. There is one comment including 'exynos5440' as following: diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c index f92f470bce21..cb525228cfe1 100644 --- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c +++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c @@ -943,7 +943,7 @@ static void exynos4210_tmu_clear_irqs(struct exynos_tmu_data *data) * Exynos3250, Exynos4412, Exynos5250 and Exynos5260 incorrectly * states that INTCLEAR register has a different placing of bits * responsible for FALL IRQs than INTSTAT register. Exynos5420 - * and Exynos5440 documentation is correct (Exynos4210 doesn't + * documentation is correct (Exynos4210 doesn't * support FALL IRQs at all). */ writel(val_irq, data->base + tmu_intclear); After removing it, looks good to me. Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi -- Best Regards, Chanwoo Choi Samsung Electronics