Re: [PATCH V5 4/7] dt-bindings: clock: Add ipq9574 NSSCC clock and reset definitions

[Devi Priya <quic_devipriy@quicinc.com>]

On 6/26/2024 9:05 PM, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 26 Jun 2024 20:02:59 +0530, Devi Priya wrote:
>> Add NSSCC clock and reset definitions for ipq9574.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Devi Priya <quic_devipriy@quicinc.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
>> ---
>>   Changes in V5:
>> 	- Dropped interconnects and added interconnect-cells to NSS
>> 	  clock provider so that it can be  used as icc provider.
>>
>>   .../bindings/clock/qcom,ipq9574-nsscc.yaml    |  74 +++++++++
>>   .../dt-bindings/clock/qcom,ipq9574-nsscc.h    | 152 ++++++++++++++++++
>>   .../dt-bindings/reset/qcom,ipq9574-nsscc.h    | 134 +++++++++++++++
>>   3 files changed, 360 insertions(+)
>>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,ipq9574-nsscc.yaml
>>   create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,ipq9574-nsscc.h
>>   create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/reset/qcom,ipq9574-nsscc.h
>>
> 
> My bot found errors running 'make dt_binding_check' on your patch:
> 
> yamllint warnings/errors:
> 
> dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
> Error: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,ipq9574-nsscc.example.dts:26.26-27 syntax error
> FATAL ERROR: Unable to parse input tree
> make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.lib:427: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,ipq9574-nsscc.example.dtb] Error 1
> make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> make[1]: *** [/builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Makefile:1430: dt_binding_check] Error 2
> make: *** [Makefile:240: __sub-make] Error 2
> 
> doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs):
> 
> See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/patch/20240626143302.810632-5-quic_devipriy@quicinc.com
> 
> The base for the series is generally the latest rc1. A different dependency
> should be noted in *this* patch.
> 
> If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above
> error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up to
> date:
> 
> pip3 install dtschema --upgrade
> 
> Please check and re-submit after running the above command yourself. Note
> that DT_SCHEMA_FILES can be set to your schema file to speed up checking
> your schema. However, it must be unset to test all examples with your schema.
> Hi Rob,

We tried running dt_binding_check on linux-next and we do not face any
sort of errors.

However in case of v6.10-rc1, patch[1] failed to apply as the dependent
patch[2] is not available on rc1.

[1] 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/patch/20240626143302.810632-3-quic_devipriy@quicinc.com/

[2] 
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?h=next-20240531&id=475beea0b9f631656b5cc39429a39696876af613

Patch [2] does not hold any functional dependency on this series but has 
a patch rebase dependency.

The Bot has went ahead and tried running the dt_binding_check on patch 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/patch/20240626143302.810632-5-quic_devipriy@quicinc.com/
which is dependent on patch [1] and hence the issue was reported.

Is this the expected behaviour?

Thanks & Regards,
Devi Priya
>