From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 218932746A; Thu, 2 Oct 2025 01:16:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1759367762; cv=none; b=fEPvpYwwQQXKYE0F5WNuxuHVdL9O1InOz0MpLe/OdNHq+vIhQvcGzYoDtA4Nm/C+AzGSmQy4rYjgpHVqpI3PEMEZ9kPrAItdY5iynnjoukpGVFWD3LvNi4FJl9R6VGeCYoGYvEbf4hgXBG6gf6IJQqMAtQ125847dic2bIaibZs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1759367762; c=relaxed/simple; bh=N+IBo+cFLuUB2dPL/xezIvU81xhMiJVOYHb+D0G1mBo=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=h8vn+ISXRexb3DjjRKzpiHLnWOQvhc8uMTQqMDgIrQTSzQQh4S1Gdpq/22w3fWLCZL7qXvoz81l5e/WoyAP54jVQ9Nb9lDlxjLHiFaOGPFj1LN3PhtwTPDZrzrSbwxG1muGJeqt1/9cIee4afI2O1sQsLVEFHubshxsWXgPXpVw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=CVHLQJt6; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="CVHLQJt6" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C730BC4CEF1; Thu, 2 Oct 2025 01:16:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1759367761; bh=N+IBo+cFLuUB2dPL/xezIvU81xhMiJVOYHb+D0G1mBo=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=CVHLQJt6/U8JVWBmh/0TqGImN2GEOkvWc3wmV6zZHdNnG5hJhRHZN1Iy9Pb6CpUuy fcvQSFWM7XIi3+nbl3B+C+UPrCBw2mnJNzLdv78a31essSprgiAKwx/zwzh+bbyBGL BfcSOuKeZyp7fkWQyyi/kp1WFSjGqik/1n6AYcOIU40n+qN18rjvq+rClZ1dZSHBV2 vWqk1ieXvlaLS2mt+xkKEh4Cb9X+IdQkyiezlMXKIukQesTo7zzRw2TjwRGGhE+CAb z9tNmwjsCWzJ+o5OqAcnhL4r7pehD1hbjIynLpZDdRIzg+rHmdSsETbf4UVnolxBEH XzIijTzu+n2AQ== Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2025 19:15:56 -0600 (MDT) From: Paul Walmsley To: Geert Uytterhoeven cc: Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Rahul Pathak , Andy Shevchenko , Anup Patel , Paul Walmsley , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: COMMON_CLK_RPMI should depend on RISCV In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <6555b47f-919b-b56c-4a76-352c904343c2@kernel.org> References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII On Tue, 30 Sep 2025, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > The RISC-V platform management interface (RPMI) is only available on > RISC-V platforms. Hence add a dependency on RISCV, to prevent asking > the user about this driver when configuring a kernel for a different > architecture. > > Fixes: 5ba9f520f41a33c9 ("clk: Add clock driver for the RISC-V RPMI clock service group") > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven Thanks Geert for catching this. This patch is against unmerged patches in -next. So I'll plan to add this to the PR that I plan to send to Linus tomorrow -- unless any of the drivers/clk maintainers would prefer that I not. > And perhaps the "default RISCV" should be dropped, too? Probably. I guess we should just add this to the arch/riscv defconfig instead. Let's wait on this one for a few days to see if anyone has any comments, and consider that change for v6.18-rc fixes. thanks again, - Paul