Re: [PATCH v5] clk: qcom: Add support for Camera Clock Controller on QCS8300

[Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>]

Quoting Imran Shaik (2025-03-20 20:56:43)
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/camcc-sa8775p.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/camcc-sa8775p.c
> index 11bd2e234811..bd75f59d3ffe 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/camcc-sa8775p.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/camcc-sa8775p.c
> @@ -1811,6 +1830,7 @@ static const struct qcom_cc_desc cam_cc_sa8775p_desc = {
>  };
>  
>  static const struct of_device_id cam_cc_sa8775p_match_table[] = {
> +       { .compatible = "qcom,qcs8300-camcc" },
>         { .compatible = "qcom,sa8775p-camcc" },
>         { }
>  };
> @@ -1841,10 +1861,83 @@ static int cam_cc_sa8775p_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>         clk_lucid_evo_pll_configure(&cam_cc_pll4, regmap, &cam_cc_pll4_config);
>         clk_lucid_evo_pll_configure(&cam_cc_pll5, regmap, &cam_cc_pll5_config);
>  
> -       /* Keep some clocks always enabled */
> -       qcom_branch_set_clk_en(regmap, 0x13194); /* CAM_CC_CAMNOC_XO_CLK */
> -       qcom_branch_set_clk_en(regmap, 0x131ec); /* CAM_CC_GDSC_CLK */
> -       qcom_branch_set_clk_en(regmap, 0x13208); /* CAM_CC_SLEEP_CLK */
> +       if (of_device_is_compatible(pdev->dev.of_node, "qcom,qcs8300-camcc")) {

Can we just use device_is_compatible() here? Then we're not specific to
DT. Or better yet, use the device match data to signal this instead of
checking compatible again, and possibly getting it wrong due to a typo
somewhere.