From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E157B442C; Thu, 2 Oct 2025 01:31:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1759368669; cv=none; b=NFSw/jYgsiqIOIteNyNR91kuirUER9r7W0lB7bGqxGOe+Vmfw20FPZS3mGin66us7GhCQ7Ssns5G2SJHjdVaICLswmZGDCBD9Y8zMaXzEZa0mZpv6uGm0OwiAePUHaLq44cOIAGl99bTFgVnU+YOVX9gmPK5N5vwlduHzQu0EdU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1759368669; c=relaxed/simple; bh=HedJW/nDt3ySfYEknVt9nC6mYxiOLbtjAAGaTegzmC0=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=dltU4ye5yRD8Zkm+I6lkGdFrLrCw5UKXfLB5aOT4yONYlD9/4lgtZap69kgxliROrrfhQ4myMvfXN9XtEEZXYuP2g+F64FC6CFx7GQCBZH7g5Q+TfrbByspFpfUHZyXI0sCL+2mVSmlR9EO5btY2RfUekx4H07/neUd0ReMAipw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=TK3FBJ2P; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="TK3FBJ2P" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CC3AFC4CEF1; Thu, 2 Oct 2025 01:31:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1759368665; bh=HedJW/nDt3ySfYEknVt9nC6mYxiOLbtjAAGaTegzmC0=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=TK3FBJ2Pi2XNFQq9wfiZrF7ao79pFnuUna+jNN0498YP7RF7HEsRgtaLhnbLS6q0r hpboNQUzFTc1MGKR12rpI9y0J3SKPMEvGY4NQP2HAaEN52crnjtGv1sLYtJ11tn06D YjPslPyB9QVE8rIkGcNSfhuH1JeIsqAvuPHJQJCtKrvmZN26/3HKrC8YiJacARUjj8 V6YCCiLuRSwwsoaYDX6V7CF84x9nYW3hLryJkVq927C1YnZAvosV1PP8ZVooNIavsO KbKcZ0y91kn+zfApjzIAoO98WSPQus3zTdGW1z9FQYmNsSawQMOGbVSAh1XK8zb903 ro8EdAaYMFEzw== Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2025 19:31:00 -0600 (MDT) From: Paul Walmsley To: Paul Walmsley cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Rahul Pathak , Andy Shevchenko , Anup Patel , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: COMMON_CLK_RPMI should depend on RISCV In-Reply-To: <6555b47f-919b-b56c-4a76-352c904343c2@kernel.org> Message-ID: <82323d78-0111-aa0d-cafb-d0c04071c6ea@kernel.org> References: <6555b47f-919b-b56c-4a76-352c904343c2@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII On Wed, 1 Oct 2025, Paul Walmsley wrote: > On Tue, 30 Sep 2025, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > And perhaps the "default RISCV" should be dropped, too? > > Probably. I guess we should just add this to the arch/riscv defconfig > instead. Let's wait on this one for a few days to see if anyone has any > comments, and consider that change for v6.18-rc fixes. Sorry, this one got garbled on the way out. I meant to say that we should think about whether it makes sense to use a more fine-grained way to enable this by default. - Paul