From: Frank Oltmanns <frank@oltmanns.dev>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Abel Vesa <abelvesa@kernel.org>, Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>, Jacky Bai <ping.bai@nxp.com>,
Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@nxp.com>,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: fractional-divider: Improve approximation when zero based
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2023 10:40:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <875y7r21ry.fsf@oltmanns.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <69a0b07442116b52e359534d93433f55.sboyd@kernel.org>
Hi Stephen,
On 2023-06-12 at 14:39:00 -0700, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> wrote:
> Quoting Frank Oltmanns (2023-05-29 06:34:33)
>> Consider the CLK_FRAC_DIVIDER_ZERO_BASED flag when finding the best
>> approximation for m and n. By doing so, increase the range of valid
>> values for the numerator and denominator by 1.
>>
>> Cc: A.s. Dong <aisheng.dong@nxp.com
>> Signed-off-by: Frank Oltmanns <frank@oltmanns.dev>
>> ---
>> I stumpled upon this, when familiarizing myself with clk drivers. Unfortunately,
>> I have no boards to test this patch. It seems the only user of this flag in
>> mainline is drivers/clk/imx/clk-composite-7ulp.c, therefore I'm cc-ing
>> get_maintainers.pl --git-blame -f drivers/clk/imx/clk-composite-7ulp.c
>> in the hopes of a wider audience.
>>
>> Thank you for considering this contribution,
>
> Thanks for looking at this. Can you add a kunit test (or a suite of
> tests) to confirm that this doesn't break existing functionality and
> also improves a case that would have failed or been suboptimal before?
Thank you for your feedback, I've submitted a V2 that contains the
tests:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230613083626.227476-1-frank@oltmanns.dev/
Thanks,
Frank
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-13 8:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-29 13:34 [PATCH] clk: fractional-divider: Improve approximation when zero based Frank Oltmanns
2023-06-12 21:39 ` Stephen Boyd
2023-06-13 8:40 ` Frank Oltmanns [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=875y7r21ry.fsf@oltmanns.dev \
--to=frank@oltmanns.dev \
--cc=Anson.Huang@nxp.com \
--cc=abelvesa@kernel.org \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=peng.fan@nxp.com \
--cc=ping.bai@nxp.com \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).