Linux clock framework development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: claudiu beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>
To: Varshini Rajendran <varshini.rajendran@microchip.com>,
	mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@kernel.org,
	nicolas.ferre@microchip.com, alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com,
	mripard@kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 24/39] clk: at91: sam9x7: add support for HW PLL freq dividers
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 07:34:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8c53aff9-eddf-47e3-939f-a1e2abb8d824@tuxon.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240223172758.672796-1-varshini.rajendran@microchip.com>



On 23.02.2024 19:27, Varshini Rajendran wrote:
> Add support for hardware dividers for PLL IDs in sam9x7 SoC. The system
> PLL - PLLA and the system PLL divided by 2 - PLLADIV2 with PLL ID 0 and
> 4 respectively, both have a hardware divider /2. This has to taken into

to be taken

> account in the software to obtain the right frequencies. Support for the
> same is added in the PLL driver.
> 
> fcorepllack -----> HW Div = 2 -+--> fpllack
>                                |
>                                +--> HW Div = 2 ---> fplladiv2ck
> 
> In this case the corepll freq is 1600 MHz. So, the plla freq is 800 MHz
> after the hardware divider and the plladiv2 freq is 400 MHz after the
> hardware divider (Given that the DIVPMC is 0).

s/Given/given

> 
> Signed-off-by: Varshini Rajendran <varshini.rajendran@microchip.com>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/at91/clk-sam9x60-pll.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  drivers/clk/at91/pmc.h             |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/at91/clk-sam9x60-pll.c b/drivers/clk/at91/clk-sam9x60-pll.c
> index b0314dfd7393..1f80759309c0 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/at91/clk-sam9x60-pll.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/at91/clk-sam9x60-pll.c
> @@ -73,9 +73,15 @@ static unsigned long sam9x60_frac_pll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
>  {
>  	struct sam9x60_pll_core *core = to_sam9x60_pll_core(hw);
>  	struct sam9x60_frac *frac = to_sam9x60_frac(core);
> +	unsigned long freq;
>  
> -	return parent_rate * (frac->mul + 1) +
> +	freq = parent_rate * (frac->mul + 1) +
>  		DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL((u64)parent_rate * frac->frac, (1 << 22));
> +
> +	if (core->layout->div2)
> +		freq >>= 1;
> +
> +	return freq;
>  }
>  
>  static int sam9x60_frac_pll_set(struct sam9x60_pll_core *core)
> @@ -432,6 +438,12 @@ static unsigned long sam9x60_div_pll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
>  	return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(parent_rate, (div->div + 1));
>  }
>  
> +static unsigned long sam9x60_fixed_div_pll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> +						       unsigned long parent_rate)
> +{
> +	return parent_rate >> 1;
> +}
> +
>  static long sam9x60_div_pll_compute_div(struct sam9x60_pll_core *core,
>  					unsigned long *parent_rate,
>  					unsigned long rate)
> @@ -606,6 +618,16 @@ static const struct clk_ops sam9x60_div_pll_ops_chg = {
>  	.restore_context = sam9x60_div_pll_restore_context,
>  };
>  
> +static const struct clk_ops sam9x60_fixed_div_pll_ops = {
> +	.prepare = sam9x60_div_pll_prepare,
> +	.unprepare = sam9x60_div_pll_unprepare,
> +	.is_prepared = sam9x60_div_pll_is_prepared,
> +	.recalc_rate = sam9x60_fixed_div_pll_recalc_rate,
> +	.round_rate = sam9x60_div_pll_round_rate,
> +	.save_context = sam9x60_div_pll_save_context,
> +	.restore_context = sam9x60_div_pll_restore_context,
> +};
> +
>  struct clk_hw * __init
>  sam9x60_clk_register_frac_pll(struct regmap *regmap, spinlock_t *lock,
>  			      const char *name, const char *parent_name,
> @@ -725,10 +747,16 @@ sam9x60_clk_register_div_pll(struct regmap *regmap, spinlock_t *lock,
>  	else
>  		init.parent_names = &parent_name;
>  	init.num_parents = 1;
> -	if (flags & CLK_SET_RATE_GATE)
> -		init.ops = &sam9x60_div_pll_ops;
> -	else
> -		init.ops = &sam9x60_div_pll_ops_chg;
> +
> +	if (layout->div2) {
> +		init.ops = &sam9x60_fixed_div_pll_ops;
> +	} else {
> +		if (flags & CLK_SET_RATE_GATE)
> +			init.ops = &sam9x60_div_pll_ops;
> +		else
> +			init.ops = &sam9x60_div_pll_ops_chg;
> +	}
> +

can't it be something like:

	if (layout->div2)
		// ...
	else if (flags & CLK_SET_RATE_GATE)
		// ...
	else
		//

?
>  	init.flags = flags;
>  
>  	div->core.id = id;
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/at91/pmc.h b/drivers/clk/at91/pmc.h
> index bb9da35198d9..91d1c6305d95 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/at91/pmc.h
> +++ b/drivers/clk/at91/pmc.h
> @@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ struct clk_pll_layout {
>  	u8 frac_shift;
>  	u8 div_shift;
>  	u8 endiv_shift;
> +	u8 div2;
>  };
>  
>  extern const struct clk_pll_layout at91rm9200_pll_layout;

  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-11  5:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-23 17:13 [PATCH v4 00/39] Add support for sam9x7 SoC family Varshini Rajendran
2024-02-23 17:27 ` [PATCH v4 21/39] dt-bindings: clk: at91: add sam9x7 Varshini Rajendran
2024-02-24 20:05   ` Conor Dooley
2024-03-11  5:32   ` claudiu beznea
2024-02-23 17:27 ` [PATCH v4 22/39] dt-bindings: clk: at91: add sam9x7 clock controller Varshini Rajendran
2024-02-24 20:06   ` Conor Dooley
2024-03-11  5:33   ` claudiu beznea
2024-02-23 17:27 ` [PATCH v4 23/39] clk: at91: clk-sam9x60-pll: re-factor to support individual core freq outputs Varshini Rajendran
2024-02-23 17:27 ` [PATCH v4 24/39] clk: at91: sam9x7: add support for HW PLL freq dividers Varshini Rajendran
2024-03-11  5:34   ` claudiu beznea [this message]
2024-02-23 17:28 ` [PATCH v4 25/39] clk: at91: sama7g5: move mux table macros to header file Varshini Rajendran
2024-02-23 17:28 ` [PATCH v4 26/39] dt-bindings: clock: at91: Allow PLLs to be exported and referenced in DT Varshini Rajendran
2024-03-01 21:26   ` Rob Herring
2024-02-23 17:28 ` [PATCH v4 27/39] clk: at91: sam9x7: add sam9x7 pmc driver Varshini Rajendran
2024-03-11  5:58   ` claudiu beznea
2024-03-18  9:25     ` Varshini.Rajendran
2024-03-18 20:17       ` claudiu beznea
2024-02-24  1:18 ` (subset) [PATCH v4 00/39] Add support for sam9x7 SoC family Mark Brown
2024-02-27  1:21 ` Andi Shyti
2024-02-27  3:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2024-02-28 15:53 ` (subset) " Mark Brown
2024-03-01 10:51 ` Herbert Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8c53aff9-eddf-47e3-939f-a1e2abb8d824@tuxon.dev \
    --to=claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mripard@kernel.org \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=varshini.rajendran@microchip.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox