From: claudiu beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>
To: Varshini Rajendran <varshini.rajendran@microchip.com>,
mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@kernel.org,
nicolas.ferre@microchip.com, alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com,
mripard@kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 24/39] clk: at91: sam9x7: add support for HW PLL freq dividers
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 07:34:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8c53aff9-eddf-47e3-939f-a1e2abb8d824@tuxon.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240223172758.672796-1-varshini.rajendran@microchip.com>
On 23.02.2024 19:27, Varshini Rajendran wrote:
> Add support for hardware dividers for PLL IDs in sam9x7 SoC. The system
> PLL - PLLA and the system PLL divided by 2 - PLLADIV2 with PLL ID 0 and
> 4 respectively, both have a hardware divider /2. This has to taken into
to be taken
> account in the software to obtain the right frequencies. Support for the
> same is added in the PLL driver.
>
> fcorepllack -----> HW Div = 2 -+--> fpllack
> |
> +--> HW Div = 2 ---> fplladiv2ck
>
> In this case the corepll freq is 1600 MHz. So, the plla freq is 800 MHz
> after the hardware divider and the plladiv2 freq is 400 MHz after the
> hardware divider (Given that the DIVPMC is 0).
s/Given/given
>
> Signed-off-by: Varshini Rajendran <varshini.rajendran@microchip.com>
> ---
> drivers/clk/at91/clk-sam9x60-pll.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> drivers/clk/at91/pmc.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/at91/clk-sam9x60-pll.c b/drivers/clk/at91/clk-sam9x60-pll.c
> index b0314dfd7393..1f80759309c0 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/at91/clk-sam9x60-pll.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/at91/clk-sam9x60-pll.c
> @@ -73,9 +73,15 @@ static unsigned long sam9x60_frac_pll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> {
> struct sam9x60_pll_core *core = to_sam9x60_pll_core(hw);
> struct sam9x60_frac *frac = to_sam9x60_frac(core);
> + unsigned long freq;
>
> - return parent_rate * (frac->mul + 1) +
> + freq = parent_rate * (frac->mul + 1) +
> DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL((u64)parent_rate * frac->frac, (1 << 22));
> +
> + if (core->layout->div2)
> + freq >>= 1;
> +
> + return freq;
> }
>
> static int sam9x60_frac_pll_set(struct sam9x60_pll_core *core)
> @@ -432,6 +438,12 @@ static unsigned long sam9x60_div_pll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(parent_rate, (div->div + 1));
> }
>
> +static unsigned long sam9x60_fixed_div_pll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> + unsigned long parent_rate)
> +{
> + return parent_rate >> 1;
> +}
> +
> static long sam9x60_div_pll_compute_div(struct sam9x60_pll_core *core,
> unsigned long *parent_rate,
> unsigned long rate)
> @@ -606,6 +618,16 @@ static const struct clk_ops sam9x60_div_pll_ops_chg = {
> .restore_context = sam9x60_div_pll_restore_context,
> };
>
> +static const struct clk_ops sam9x60_fixed_div_pll_ops = {
> + .prepare = sam9x60_div_pll_prepare,
> + .unprepare = sam9x60_div_pll_unprepare,
> + .is_prepared = sam9x60_div_pll_is_prepared,
> + .recalc_rate = sam9x60_fixed_div_pll_recalc_rate,
> + .round_rate = sam9x60_div_pll_round_rate,
> + .save_context = sam9x60_div_pll_save_context,
> + .restore_context = sam9x60_div_pll_restore_context,
> +};
> +
> struct clk_hw * __init
> sam9x60_clk_register_frac_pll(struct regmap *regmap, spinlock_t *lock,
> const char *name, const char *parent_name,
> @@ -725,10 +747,16 @@ sam9x60_clk_register_div_pll(struct regmap *regmap, spinlock_t *lock,
> else
> init.parent_names = &parent_name;
> init.num_parents = 1;
> - if (flags & CLK_SET_RATE_GATE)
> - init.ops = &sam9x60_div_pll_ops;
> - else
> - init.ops = &sam9x60_div_pll_ops_chg;
> +
> + if (layout->div2) {
> + init.ops = &sam9x60_fixed_div_pll_ops;
> + } else {
> + if (flags & CLK_SET_RATE_GATE)
> + init.ops = &sam9x60_div_pll_ops;
> + else
> + init.ops = &sam9x60_div_pll_ops_chg;
> + }
> +
can't it be something like:
if (layout->div2)
// ...
else if (flags & CLK_SET_RATE_GATE)
// ...
else
//
?
> init.flags = flags;
>
> div->core.id = id;
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/at91/pmc.h b/drivers/clk/at91/pmc.h
> index bb9da35198d9..91d1c6305d95 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/at91/pmc.h
> +++ b/drivers/clk/at91/pmc.h
> @@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ struct clk_pll_layout {
> u8 frac_shift;
> u8 div_shift;
> u8 endiv_shift;
> + u8 div2;
> };
>
> extern const struct clk_pll_layout at91rm9200_pll_layout;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-11 5:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-23 17:13 [PATCH v4 00/39] Add support for sam9x7 SoC family Varshini Rajendran
2024-02-23 17:27 ` [PATCH v4 21/39] dt-bindings: clk: at91: add sam9x7 Varshini Rajendran
2024-02-24 20:05 ` Conor Dooley
2024-03-11 5:32 ` claudiu beznea
2024-02-23 17:27 ` [PATCH v4 22/39] dt-bindings: clk: at91: add sam9x7 clock controller Varshini Rajendran
2024-02-24 20:06 ` Conor Dooley
2024-03-11 5:33 ` claudiu beznea
2024-02-23 17:27 ` [PATCH v4 23/39] clk: at91: clk-sam9x60-pll: re-factor to support individual core freq outputs Varshini Rajendran
2024-02-23 17:27 ` [PATCH v4 24/39] clk: at91: sam9x7: add support for HW PLL freq dividers Varshini Rajendran
2024-03-11 5:34 ` claudiu beznea [this message]
2024-02-23 17:28 ` [PATCH v4 25/39] clk: at91: sama7g5: move mux table macros to header file Varshini Rajendran
2024-02-23 17:28 ` [PATCH v4 26/39] dt-bindings: clock: at91: Allow PLLs to be exported and referenced in DT Varshini Rajendran
2024-03-01 21:26 ` Rob Herring
2024-02-23 17:28 ` [PATCH v4 27/39] clk: at91: sam9x7: add sam9x7 pmc driver Varshini Rajendran
2024-03-11 5:58 ` claudiu beznea
2024-03-18 9:25 ` Varshini.Rajendran
2024-03-18 20:17 ` claudiu beznea
2024-02-24 1:18 ` (subset) [PATCH v4 00/39] Add support for sam9x7 SoC family Mark Brown
2024-02-27 1:21 ` Andi Shyti
2024-02-27 3:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2024-02-28 15:53 ` (subset) " Mark Brown
2024-03-01 10:51 ` Herbert Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8c53aff9-eddf-47e3-939f-a1e2abb8d824@tuxon.dev \
--to=claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=varshini.rajendran@microchip.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox