Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] clk: bcm283x: add driver interfacing with Raspberry Pi's firmware

[Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com>]

Am 07.06.19 um 11:42 schrieb Nicolas Saenz Julienne:
> On Fri, 2019-06-07 at 11:26 +0200, Stefan Wahren wrote:
>> Hi Nicolas,
>>
>> Am 06.06.19 um 16:22 schrieb Nicolas Saenz Julienne:
>>> Raspberry Pi's firmware offers an interface though which update it's
>>> clock's frequencies. This is specially useful in order to change the CPU
>>> clock (pllb_arm) which is 'owned' by the firmware and we're unable to
>>> scale using the register interface provided by clk-bcm2835.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>
>>> Acked-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
>>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Changes since v1:
>>>   - Use BIT()
>>>   - Add Kconfig entry, with compile test
>>>   - remove prepare/unprepare
>>>   - Fix uninitialized init.name in pllb registration
>>>   - Add MODULE_ALIAS()
>>>   - Use determine_rate() instead of round_rate()
>>>   - Add small introduction explaining need for driver
>>>
>>>  drivers/clk/bcm/Kconfig           |   7 +
>>>  drivers/clk/bcm/Makefile          |   1 +
>>>  drivers/clk/bcm/clk-raspberrypi.c | 302 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  3 files changed, 310 insertions(+)
>>>  create mode 100644 drivers/clk/bcm/clk-raspberrypi.c
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/bcm/Kconfig b/drivers/clk/bcm/Kconfig
>>> index 29ee7b776cd4..a4a2775d65e1 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/clk/bcm/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/bcm/Kconfig
>>> @@ -64,3 +64,10 @@ config CLK_BCM_SR
>>>  	default ARCH_BCM_IPROC
>>>  	help
>>>  	  Enable common clock framework support for the Broadcom Stingray SoC
>>> +
>>> +config CLK_RASPBERRYPI
>>> +	tristate "Raspberry Pi firmware based clock support"
>>> +	depends on RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE || (COMPILE_TEST &&
>>> !RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE)
>>> +	help
>>> +	  Enable common clock framework support for Raspberry Pi's firmware
>>> +	  dependent clocks
>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/bcm/Makefile b/drivers/clk/bcm/Makefile
>>> index 002661d39128..eb7159099d82 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/clk/bcm/Makefile
>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/bcm/Makefile
>>> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_CLK_BCM_KONA)	+= clk-bcm21664.o
>>>  obj-$(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_IPROC)	+= clk-iproc-armpll.o clk-iproc-pll.o
>>> clk-iproc-asiu.o
>>>  obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_BCM2835)	+= clk-bcm2835.o
>>>  obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_BCM2835)	+= clk-bcm2835-aux.o
>>> +obj-$(CONFIG_CLK_RASPBERRYPI)	+= clk-raspberrypi.o
>>>  obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_BCM_53573)	+= clk-bcm53573-ilp.o
>>>  obj-$(CONFIG_CLK_BCM_CYGNUS)	+= clk-cygnus.o
>>>  obj-$(CONFIG_CLK_BCM_HR2)	+= clk-hr2.o
>> not your fault but you better rebase your next version on linux-next
>> because Florian's latest patches ("clk: bcm: Make BCM2835 clock drivers
>> selectable") collide with this patch.
>>
>> Checkpatch gives the following output about this patch:
>>
>> WARNING: 'harware' may be misspelled - perhaps 'hardware'?
>>
>> #58: FILE: drivers/clk/bcm/clk-raspberrypi.c:5:
>> + * Even though clk-bcm2835 provides an interface to the harware
>> registers for
>>
>> ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
>> #197: FILE: drivers/clk/bcm/clk-raspberrypi.c:144:
>> +^I^I^I^I           struct clk_rate_request *req)$
> Noted, thanks.
>
> As this seems fairly calm, should I send v3 or wait little more?
>
Please wait until i'm finished with testing.

If i don't gave you a feedback until Tuesday, send out your next
version. Okay?